Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 24;12(7):829.
doi: 10.3390/ani12070829.

The Use of Animal's Body, Scrotal Temperature and Motion Monitoring in Evaluating Boar Semen Production Capacity

Vasiliki Stravogianni  1 , Theodoros Samaras  2 , Constantin M Boscos  1 , John Markakis  2 , Evdokia Krystallidou  3 , Athina Basioura  4 , Ioannis A Tsakmakidis  1
Affiliations

The Use of Animal's Body, Scrotal Temperature and Motion Monitoring in Evaluating Boar Semen Production Capacity

Vasiliki Stravogianni et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Biomedical measurements by specialized technological equipment have been used in farm animals to collect information about nutrition, behavior and welfare. This study investigates the relation of semen quality (CASA analysis, viability, morphology, membrane biochemical activity and DNA fragmentation) with boar behavior during ejaculation. Sensors were placed on the boar’s body. Movement features were collected using an inertial measurement unit (IMU), comprising an accelerometer, a gyroscope and a magnetometer. Boar, scrotal and dummy temperatures were measured by an infrared (IR) camera and an IR thermometer, while the face salivation of the boar was recorded by a moisture meter (also based on IR technology). All signals and images were logged on a mobile device (smartphone or tablet) using a Bluetooth connection and then transferred wirelessly to the cloud. The data files were then processed using scripts in MATLAB 2021a (MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts) to derive the necessary indices. Ninety-four ejaculates from five boars were analyzed in this study. The statistical analysis was performed in the Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox of MATLAB 2021a using a linear mixed effects model. Significant and strong negative correlations (R2 > 0.5, p ≤ 0.05) were observed between boar, dummy and scrotal temperature with the progressive, rapid and slow movement of spermatozoa, VCL (curvilinear velocity), VSL (straight line velocity) and ALH (amplitude of lateral head displacement) kinematics. The volume of the ejaculate was correlated with the scrotal and dummy temperature. Dummy’s temperature was negatively correlated with BCF (beat/cross-frequency), viability and total time of ejaculation, while it was positively correlated with abnormal morphology. Body temperature was negatively correlated with BCF. Positive correlations were noticed between VAP (average path velocity) and total time of ejaculation with body acceleration features, as well as between the overall dynamic body acceleration (ODBA) and total time of ejaculation. In conclusion, the use of biomedical sensors can support the evaluation of boar sperm production capacity, providing valuable information about semen quality.

Keywords: biomedicine; boar semen; fertility; pig; sensor signals; thermal camera.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Thermal image of three boar scrotum’s surface areas (square, cross and circle area) during ejaculation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Boar salivation and face moisture imaging during ejaculation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Okere C., Joseph A., Ezekwe M. Seasonal and genotype variations in libido, semen production and quality in artificial insemination boars. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2005;4:885–888.
    1. Smital J. Effects influencing boar semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2009;110:335–346. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.01.024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Colenbrander B., Kemp B. Factors influencing semen quality in pigs. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 1990;40:105–115. - PubMed
    1. Levis D.G., Reicks D.L. Assessment of sexual behavior and effect of semen collection pen design and sexual stimulation boars on behavior and sperm output–a review. Theriogenology. 2005;63:630–642. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stančić I., Radović I., Stančić B., Stevančević O., Stevančević M. “Boar effect” influence on gilts estrual reaction. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2019;9:1540–1550.

LinkOut - more resources