Clitoral reconstruction: challenges and new directions
- PMID: 35418603
- PMCID: PMC10159845
- DOI: 10.1038/s41443-022-00572-6
Clitoral reconstruction: challenges and new directions
Abstract
Clitoral reconstruction (CR) has been the subject of several studies in recent years, mainly in the medical field. Women with female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) seek clitoral reconstructive surgery to improve their sexual well-being, but also because they are affected by poor self- and body image. CR is supposed to help women with FGM/C reconstruct their sense of self, but the benefits and risks of this surgery have not been sufficiently explored. There are currently no recommendations supporting CR from mainstream medical bodies, and there have been very few ethical studies of the procedure. This article critically discusses the principal studies produced in the medical field and available reflections produced in the social sciences. Through the theoretical frameworks of postcolonial and feminist studies, the article discusses sexuality and pleasure, gender and identity, and race and positionality, with the aim of promoting collaborative work on CR between researchers and social and health professionals.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation/cutting: case studies.J Sex Med. 2015 Jan;12(1):274-81. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12737. Epub 2014 Nov 25. J Sex Med. 2015. PMID: 25421071
-
Clitoral Reconstruction After Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Review of Surgical Techniques and Ethical Debate.J Sex Med. 2020 Mar;17(3):531-542. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.12.004. Epub 2020 Jan 10. J Sex Med. 2020. PMID: 31932257 Review.
-
Using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) to evaluate sexual function in women with genital mutilation undergoing surgical reconstruction: a pilot prospective study.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Jul;202:71-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.029. Epub 2016 Apr 30. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016. PMID: 27180272
-
Clitoral Reconstructive Surgery After Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Anatomy, Technical Innovations and Updates of the Initial Technique.J Sex Med. 2021 May;18(5):996-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Apr 27. J Sex Med. 2021. PMID: 33931348 Review.
-
Sexual Anatomy and Function in Women With and Without Genital Mutilation: A Cross-Sectional Study.J Sex Med. 2016 Feb;13(2):226-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.12.023. Epub 2016 Jan 27. J Sex Med. 2016. PMID: 26827253
Cited by
-
Changing gender norms around female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): a key role for social work in the Global North.Front Sociol. 2023 Jun 2;8:1187981. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1187981. eCollection 2023. Front Sociol. 2023. PMID: 37333066 Free PMC article. Review.
-
"Damaged genitals"-Cut women's perceptions of the effect of female genital cutting on sexual function. A qualitative study from Sweden.Front Sociol. 2022 Aug 12;7:943949. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.943949. eCollection 2022. Front Sociol. 2022. PMID: 36033981 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abdulcadir J, Margairaz C, Boulvain M, Irion O. Care of women with female genital mutilation/cutting. Swiss Medical Weekly; 2011; 10.4414/smw.2010.13137. - PubMed
-
- Evans C, Tweheyo R, McGarry J, Eldridge J, Albert J, Nkoyo V, et al. Improving care for women and girls who have undergone female genital mutilation/cutting: qualitative systematic reviews. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2019;7. 10.3310/hsdr07310. - PubMed
-
- Andro A, Lesclingand M, Cambois E, Cirbeau C. Volet quantitatif du projet Excision et handicap (ExH): mesure des lésions et traumatismes et évaluation des besoins en chirurgie réparatrice. Paris: Rapport DGS. INED, Université de Paris 1; 2009.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
