Development and External Validation of a Simple-To-Use Dynamic Nomogram for Predicting Breast Malignancy Based on Ultrasound Morphometric Features: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

Qingling Zhang; Qinglu Zhang; Taixia Liu; Tingting Bao; Qingqing Li; You Yang

doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.868164

Development and External Validation of a Simple-To-Use Dynamic Nomogram for Predicting Breast Malignancy Based on Ultrasound Morphometric Features: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 7:12:868164. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.868164. eCollection 2022.

Authors

Qingling Zhang¹, Qinglu Zhang², Taixia Liu³, Tingting Bao¹, Qingqing Li¹, You Yang¹

Affiliations

¹ Depatment of Ultrasonography, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.
² Department of Ultrasonography, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital Affiliated to Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
³ Department of Ultrasonography, Linyi People's Hospital, Linyi, China.

Abstract

Background: With advances in high-throughput computational mining techniques, various quantitative predictive models that are based on ultrasound have been developed. However, the lack of reproducibility and interpretability have hampered clinical use. In this study, we aimed at developing and validating an interpretable and simple-to-use US nomogram that is based on quantitative morphometric features for the prediction of breast malignancy.

Methods: Successive 917 patients with histologically confirmed breast lesions were included in this retrospective multicentric study and assigned to one training cohort and two external validation cohorts. Morphometric features were extracted from grayscale US images. After feature selection and validation of regression assumptions, a dynamic nomogram with a web-based calculator was developed. The performance of the nomogram was assessed with respect to calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness.

Results: Through feature selection, three morphometric features were identified as being the most optimal for predicting malignancy, and all regression assumptions of the prediction model were met. Combining all these predictors, the nomogram demonstrated a good discriminative performance in the training cohort and in the two external validation cohorts with AUCs of 0.885, 0.907, and 0.927, respectively. In addition, calibration and decision curves analyses showed good calibration and clinical usefulness.

Conclusions: By incorporating US morphometric features, we constructed an interpretable and easy-to-use dynamic nomogram for quantifying the probability of breast malignancy. The developed nomogram has good generalization abilities, which may fit into clinical practice and serve as a potential tool to guide personalized treatment. Our findings show that quantitative morphometric features from different ultrasound machines and systems can be used as imaging surrogate biomarkers for the development of robust and reproducible quantitative ultrasound dynamic models in breast cancer research.

Keywords: breast cancer; models; morphometrics; nomogram; quantitative imaging; ultrasound.