International Validation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score : A Cohort Study
- PMID: 35467933
- DOI: 10.7326/M21-2313
International Validation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score : A Cohort Study
Abstract
Background: The Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) was developed to predict 30-day serious outcomes not evident during emergency department (ED) evaluation.
Objective: To externally validate the CSRS and compare it with another validated score, the Osservatorio Epidemiologico della Sincope nel Lazio (OESIL) score.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: Large, international, multicenter study recruiting patients in EDs in 8 countries on 3 continents.
Participants: Patients with syncope aged 40 years or older presenting to the ED within 12 hours of syncope.
Measurements: Composite outcome of serious clinical plus procedural events (primary outcome) and the primary composite outcome excluding procedural interventions (secondary outcome).
Results: Among 2283 patients with a mean age of 68 years, the primary composite outcome occurred in 7.2%, and the composite outcome excluding procedural interventions occurred in 3.1% at 30 days. Prognostic performance of the CSRS was good for both 30-day composite outcomes and better compared with the OESIL score (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.85 [95% CI, 0.83 to 0.88] vs. 0.74 [CI, 0.71 to 0.78] and 0.80 [CI, 0.75 to 0.84] vs. 0.69 [CI, 0.64 to 0.75], respectively). Safety of triage, as measured by the frequency of the primary composite outcome in the low-risk group, was higher using the CSRS (19 of 1388 [0.6%]) versus the OESIL score (17 of 1104 [1.5%]). A simplified model including only the clinician classification of syncope (cardiac syncope, vasovagal syncope, or other) variable at ED discharge-a component of the CSRS-achieved similar discrimination as the CSRS (AUC, 0.83 [CI, 0.80 to 0.87] for the primary composite outcome).
Limitation: Unable to disentangle the influence of other CSRS components on clinician classification of syncope at ED discharge.
Conclusion: This international external validation of the CSRS showed good performance in identifying patients at low risk for serious outcomes outside of Canada and superior performance compared with the OESIL score. However, clinician classification of syncope at ED discharge seems to explain much of the performance of the CSRS in this study. The clinical utility of the CSRS remains uncertain.
Primary funding source: Swiss National Science Foundation & Swiss Heart Foundation.
Comment in
-
Syncope in the Emergency Department: Should We Be Using the Canadian Syncope Risk Score?: July 2023 Annals of Emergency Medicine Journal Club.Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Jul;82(1):115-117. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.05.023. Ann Emerg Med. 2023. PMID: 37349069 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Multicenter Emergency Department Validation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score.JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):737-744. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0288. JAMA Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 32202605 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of syncope risk scores in predicting the prognosis of patients presenting to the emergency department with syncope.Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Dec;192(6):2727-2734. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03395-6. Epub 2023 May 12. Ir J Med Sci. 2023. PMID: 37171572
-
Duration of Electrocardiographic Monitoring of Emergency Department Patients With Syncope.Circulation. 2019 Mar 12;139(11):1396-1406. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036088. Circulation. 2019. PMID: 30661373
-
Risk-stratification tools for emergency department patients with syncope: A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct evidence for SAEM GRACE.Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 4. doi: 10.1111/acem.15041. Online ahead of print. Acad Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 39496561 Review.
-
Can I Send This Syncope Patient Home From the Emergency Department?J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;61(6):801-809. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.07.060. Epub 2021 Sep 15. J Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 34535304 Review.
Cited by
-
Syncope in the Emergency Department: A Practical Approach.J Clin Med. 2024 May 30;13(11):3231. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113231. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38892942 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Hybrid Model for 30-Day Syncope Prognosis Prediction in the Emergency Department.J Pers Med. 2023 Dec 20;14(1):4. doi: 10.3390/jpm14010004. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 38276219 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Admission of Patients With Syncope in Non-Teaching Hospitals Versus Teaching Hospitals: A Nationwide Analysis.Cureus. 2023 May 26;15(5):e39545. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39545. eCollection 2023 May. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37378229 Free PMC article.
-
Arrhythmic syncope: From diagnosis to management.World J Cardiol. 2023 Apr 26;15(4):119-141. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i4.119. World J Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 37124975 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical