Objectives: This subgroup analysis of the randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 ADVOCATE study evaluated the efficacy and safety of avacopan compared with tapered prednisone in Japanese patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.
Methods: Patients with microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) or granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) received either avacopan 30 mg twice daily for 52 weeks plus prednisone-matching placebo or tapered prednisone over 20 weeks plus avacopan-matching placebo for 52 weeks. The two primary efficacy endpoints were clinical remission at Week 26 and sustained remission at Week 52.
Results: Compared with the overall population (N = 330), Japanese patients (N = 21) were older and had worse renal function, and a higher proportion were female and had MPA. The proportion of Japanese patients with clinical remission at Week 26 was 9/11 (81.8%) with avacopan vs. 7/10 (70.0%) with prednisone (overall population: 72.3% vs. 70.1%) and with sustained remission at Week 52 was 8/11 (72.7%) vs. 4/10 (40.0%), respectively (overall population: 65.7% vs. 54.9%). The safety profile of avacopan was similar in Japanese patients and the overall study population.
Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of avacopan in Japanese patients with MPA or GPA were comparable to that observed in the overall ADVOCATE study population.
Keywords: ANCA; Japanese patients; antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis; avacopan; subgroup analysis.
© Japan College of Rheumatology 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.