Aim: This study aims to explore nurses' perceptions of hourly rounding in Jordanian hospitals.
Background: Hourly rounding is a standardized and systematic process conducted by nurses to anticipate and address needs in hospitalized patients. The evidence on hourly rounding is mixed, and research is needed to affirm the benefits of implementing hourly rounding across different contexts.
Method: A cross-sectional correlational design was used. A convenient sample of 1378 nurses was recruited from one military hospital, two university-affiliated hospitals, four governmental hospitals and four private hospitals in Jordan. The Hourly Rounding Questionnaire was used to collect data. Descriptive statistics, t test, one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis H test were used to analyse the data.
Results: The highest agreements between nurses were on the items related to the implementation of hourly rounding in terms of 'preventing patient falls' 1211 (87.9%), 'preventing hospital-acquired pressure ulcers' 1201 (87.2%) and 'addressing patients' position' 1199 (87%). The lowest agreements between nurses were on the items related to the involvement of nurses in the decision-making process and sense of ownership 268 (19.4%) and the availability of continued support and resources 239 (17.3%). Female nurses, nurses who often work on a shift rotation, nurses working in private hospitals and respiratory units had a positive perception of hourly rounding.
Implications for nursing management: Findings will inform nursing leaders and policy developers about the implementation of hourly rounding from nurses' perspectives. A protocol should accompany hourly rounding for robust evaluation to measure the impact of this process change with the involvement of nurses in the decision-making process.
Keywords: Jordan; hourly rounding; national survey; nurses' perceptions.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.