Effect of Awake Prone Positioning on Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 35569448
- PMCID: PMC9108999
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.7993
Effect of Awake Prone Positioning on Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Importance: The efficacy and safety of prone positioning is unclear in nonintubated patients with acute hypoxemia and COVID-19.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of prone positioning in nonintubated adult patients with acute hypoxemia and COVID-19.
Design, setting, and participants: Pragmatic, unblinded randomized clinical trial conducted at 21 hospitals in Canada, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and the US. Eligible adult patients with COVID-19 were not intubated and required oxygen (≥40%) or noninvasive ventilation. A total of 400 patients were enrolled between May 19, 2020, and May 18, 2021, and final follow-up was completed in July 2021.
Intervention: Patients were randomized to awake prone positioning (n = 205) or usual care without prone positioning (control; n = 195).
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation within 30 days of randomization. The secondary outcomes included mortality at 60 days, days free from invasive mechanical ventilation or noninvasive ventilation at 30 days, days free from the intensive care unit or hospital at 60 days, adverse events, and serious adverse events.
Results: Among the 400 patients who were randomized (mean age, 57.6 years [SD, 12.83 years]; 117 [29.3%] were women), all (100%) completed the trial. In the first 4 days after randomization, the median duration of prone positioning was 4.8 h/d (IQR, 1.8 to 8.0 h/d) in the awake prone positioning group vs 0 h/d (IQR, 0 to 0 h/d) in the control group. By day 30, 70 of 205 patients (34.1%) in the prone positioning group were intubated vs 79 of 195 patients (40.5%) in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.59 to 1.12], P = .20; absolute difference, -6.37% [95% CI, -15.83% to 3.10%]). Prone positioning did not significantly reduce mortality at 60 days (hazard ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.40], P = .54; absolute difference, -1.15% [95% CI, -9.40% to 7.10%]) and had no significant effect on days free from invasive mechanical ventilation or noninvasive ventilation at 30 days or on days free from the intensive care unit or hospital at 60 days. There were no serious adverse events in either group. In the awake prone positioning group, 21 patients (10%) experienced adverse events and the most frequently reported were musculoskeletal pain or discomfort from prone positioning (13 of 205 patients [6.34%]) and desaturation (2 of 205 patients [0.98%]). There were no reported adverse events in the control group.
Conclusions and relevance: In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure from COVID-19, prone positioning, compared with usual care without prone positioning, did not significantly reduce endotracheal intubation at 30 days. However, the effect size for the primary study outcome was imprecise and does not exclude a clinically important benefit.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04350723.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
In COVID-19 acute hypoxemia, awake prone positioning vs. usual care did not reduce intubation at 30 d.Ann Intern Med. 2022 Sep;175(9):JC99. doi: 10.7326/J22-0068. Epub 2022 Sep 6. Ann Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 36063555 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Awake Prone Positioning on Patients With COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Failure.JAMA. 2022 Oct 4;328(13):1354. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.13991. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 36194223 No abstract available.
-
Effect of Awake Prone Positioning on Patients With COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Failure.JAMA. 2022 Oct 4;328(13):1353-1354. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.13988. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 36194224 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prolonged vs shorter awake prone positioning for COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure: a multicenter, randomised controlled trial.Intensive Care Med. 2024 Aug;50(8):1298-1309. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07545-x. Epub 2024 Aug 1. Intensive Care Med. 2024. PMID: 39088076 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Awake prone positioning in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19: the PROFLO multicenter randomized clinical trial.Crit Care. 2021 Jun 14;25(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03602-9. Crit Care. 2021. PMID: 34127046 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Hypoxaemic respiratory failure and awake prone ventilation (HYPER-AP) - Protocol for randomized, controlled clinical trial.Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Oct;145:107614. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107614. Epub 2024 Jun 28. Contemp Clin Trials. 2024. PMID: 38945293 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of mechanical ventilation in the prone position on clinical outcomes in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CMAJ. 2008 Apr 22;178(9):1153-61. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.071802. CMAJ. 2008. PMID: 18427090 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prone position for acute respiratory failure in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 13;2015(11):CD008095. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008095.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26561745 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Early physiologic changes after awake prone positioning predict clinical outcomes in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.Intensive Care Med. 2024 Dec;50(12):2105-2113. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07690-3. Epub 2024 Nov 14. Intensive Care Med. 2024. PMID: 39542899
-
Oxygen therapy and noninvasive respiratory supports in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a narrative review.Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Oct 18;14(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01389-w. Ann Intensive Care. 2024. PMID: 39419924 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Respiratory Support in COVID-19-Related Respiratory Failure: Lessons Learnt.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1457:97-109. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-61939-7_5. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024. PMID: 39283422 Review.
-
Oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: guidelines from the SRLF-SFMU consensus conference.Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Sep 5;14(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01367-2. Ann Intensive Care. 2024. PMID: 39235690 Free PMC article.
-
Prolonged vs shorter awake prone positioning for COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure: a multicenter, randomised controlled trial.Intensive Care Med. 2024 Aug;50(8):1298-1309. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07545-x. Epub 2024 Aug 1. Intensive Care Med. 2024. PMID: 39088076 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
