Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 18;107(9):e3877-e3886.
doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac324.

Repeat Bone Mineral Density Screening Measurement and Fracture Prediction in Older Men: A Prospective Cohort Study

Affiliations

Repeat Bone Mineral Density Screening Measurement and Fracture Prediction in Older Men: A Prospective Cohort Study

Kristine E Ensrud et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. .

Abstract

Context: Whether repeated bone mineral density (BMD) screening improves fracture prediction in men is uncertain.

Objective: We evaluated whether a second BMD 7 years after the initial BMD improves fracture prediction in older men.

Methods: Among 3651 community-dwelling men (mean age 79.1 years) with total hip BMD at baseline and Year 7 (Y7), self-reported fractures after Y7 were confirmed by radiographic reports. Fracture prediction assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression and logistic regression with receiver operating characteristic curves for models based on initial BMD, BMD change, and the combination of initial BMD and BMD change (combination model).

Results: During an average follow-up of 8.2 years after Y7, 793 men experienced ≥ 1 clinical fractures, including 426 men with major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) and 193 men with hip fractures. Both initial BMD and BMD change were associated with risk of fracture outcomes independent of each other, but the association was stronger for initial BMD. For example, the multivariable hazard ratio of MOF in the combination model per 1 SD decrement in BMD was 1.76 (95% CI 1.57-1.98) for initial BMD and 1.19 (95% CI 1.08-1.32) for BMD change. Discrimination of fracture outcomes with initial BMD models was somewhat better than with BMD change models and similar to combination models (AUC value for MOF 0.68 [95% CI 0.66-0.71] for initial BMD model, 0.63 [95% CI 0.61-0.66] for BMD change model, and 0.69 [95% CI 0.66-0.71] for combination model).

Conclusion: Repeating BMD after 7 years did not meaningfully improve fracture prediction at the population level in community-dwelling older men.

Keywords: bone mineral density; fracture risk; older men.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Participant flow diagram.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Receiver operating characteristic curves for models* predicting (A) major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), (B) any clinical fracture and (C) hip fracture. *Models based on initial total hip BMD, annualized percent total hip BMD change and the combination of initial total hip BMD and annualized percent total hip BMD change. All models are adjusted for age, race, study enrollment site, prior fracture, fall in past year, multimorbidity, physical activity, body mass index and weight change.

Comment in

  • How Often Should We Measure Bone Density?
    Reid IR. Reid IR. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Sep 28;107(10):e4267-e4268. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac403. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022. PMID: 35776507 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(3):465-475. doi:10.1359/jbmr.061113 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cummings SR, Cawthon PM, Ensrud KE, et al. . BMD and risk of hip and nonvertebral fractures in older men: a prospective study and comparison with older women. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21(10):1550-1556. doi:10.1359/jbmr.060708 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Kelly PJ, Sambrook PN. Risk factors for osteoporotic fractures in elderly men. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144(3):255-263. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008920 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, et al. . Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(10):2359-2381. doi:10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watts NB, Adler RA, Bilezikian JP, et al. . Osteoporosis in men: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(6):1802-1822. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-3045 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types