Screening for Impaired Visual Acuity in Older Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
- PMID: 35608842
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.6381
Screening for Impaired Visual Acuity in Older Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
Erratum in
-
Incorrect Reference.JAMA. 2022 Aug 9;328(6):586. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.12137. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 35943483 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Importance: A 2016 review for the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) found that effective treatments are available for refractive errors, cataracts, and wet (advanced neovascular) or dry (atrophic) age-related macular degeneration (AMD), but there were no differences between visual screening vs no screening on visual acuity or other outcomes.
Objective: To update the 2016 review on screening for impaired visual acuity in older adults, to inform the USPSTF.
Data sources: Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (to February 2021); surveillance through January 21, 2022.
Study selection: Randomized clinical trials and controlled observational studies on screening, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors (wet AMD), and antioxidant vitamins and minerals (dry AMD); studies on screening diagnostic accuracy.
Data extraction and synthesis: One investigator abstracted data and a second checked accuracy. Two investigators independently assessed study quality.
Results: Twenty-five studies (N = 33 586) were included (13 trials, 11 diagnostic accuracy studies, and 1 systematic review [19 trials]). Four trials (n = 4819) found no significant differences between screening vs no screening in visual acuity or other outcomes. Visual acuity tests (3 studies; n = 6493) and screening question (3 studies; n = 5203) were associated with suboptimal diagnostic accuracy. For wet AMD, 4 trials (n = 2086) found VEGF inhibitors significantly associated with greater likelihood of 15 or more letters visual acuity gain (risk ratio [RR], 2.92 [95% CI, 1.20-7.12]; I2 = 76%; absolute risk difference [ARD], 10%) and less than 15 letters visual acuity loss (RR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.22-1.75]; I2 = 80%; ARD, 27%) vs sham treatment, with no increased risk of serious harms. For dry AMD, a systematic review (19 trials) found antioxidant multivitamins significantly associated with decreased risk of progression to late AMD (3 trials, n = 2445; odds ratio [OR], 0.72 [95% CI, 0.58-0.90]) and 3 lines or more visual acuity loss (1 trial, n = 1791; OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.62-0.96]) vs placebo. Zinc was significantly associated with increased risk of genitourinary events and beta carotene with increased risk of lung cancer in former smokers; other serious harms were infrequent.
Conclusions and relevance: This review found that effective treatments are available for common causes of impaired visual acuity in older adults. However, direct evidence found no significant association between vision screening vs no screening in primary care and improved visual outcomes.
Similar articles
-
Screening for Impaired Visual Acuity in Older Adults: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2022 May. Report No.: 21-05285-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2022 May. Report No.: 21-05285-EF-1. PMID: 35671358 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Screening for Impaired Visual Acuity in Older Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA. 2016 Mar 1;315(9):915-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0783. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 26934261 Review.
-
Screening for Visual Impairment in Older Adults: Systematic Review to Update the 1996 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2009 Jul. Report No.: 09-05135-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2009 Jul. Report No.: 09-05135-EF-1. PMID: 20722170 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Screening older adults for impaired visual acuity: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jul 7;151(1):44-58, W11-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-1-200907070-00008. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19581646 Review.
-
Screening for Impaired Visual Acuity in Older Adults: A Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Mar. Report No.: 14-05209-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Mar. Report No.: 14-05209-EF-1. PMID: 27010054 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Older adults' perceptions of navigating eye health care in Denmark: a qualitative study.BJGP Open. 2024 Apr 25;8(1):BJGPO.2023.0118. doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0118. Print 2024 Apr. BJGP Open. 2024. PMID: 37903529 Free PMC article.
-
Intrinsic Capacities, Functional Ability, Physiological Systems, and Caregiver Support: A Targeted Synthesis of Effective Interventions and International Recommendations for Older Adults.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 1;20(5):4382. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054382. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36901392 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Incorrect Reference.JAMA. 2022 Aug 9;328(6):586. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.12137. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 35943483 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
