Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 10;3(4):100255.
doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100255. eCollection 2022 Jul 12.

Toripalimab in advanced biliary tract cancer

Affiliations

Toripalimab in advanced biliary tract cancer

Wei Li et al. Innovation (Camb). .

Abstract

Gemcitabine combined with platinum/fluorouracil drugs is the standard first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs). We explored the safety and efficacy of toripalimab plus gemcitabine and S-1 (GS) as the first-line treatment for advanced BTCs. At a one-sided significance level of 0.025, a total of 50 patients could provide 80% power to show the efficacy at targeted progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months of 70% versus 40% for the combined treatment. This single-arm, phase II study enrolled 50 patients with advanced BTCs who previously received no systemic treatment. The regimen was as follows: toripalimab (240 mg, i.v., d1), gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2, i.v., d1 and d8), and S-1 (40-60 mg bid p.o., d1-14, Q21d). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and safety. The associations between response with PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and genetic variations were explored. Patients were enrolled from January 2019 to August 2020, with a median follow-up time of 24.0 months (IQR: 4.3-31.0 months). The 6-month PFS rate was 62%. The median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.0-8.9 months), and median OS was 15.0 months (95% CI: 11.6-18.4 months). Forty-nine patients completed the evaluation for tumor response. The ORR was 30.6% (95% CI: 17.2%-44.0%), and the disease control rate was 87.8% (95% CI: 78.2%-97.3%). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were leukopenia (98.0%), neutropenia (92%), and anemia (86.0%). Grade III/IV TRAEs included leukopenia (38.0%), neutropenia (32%), skin rash (6%), anemia (2.0%), mucositis (2%), and immune-related colitis (2%). Among them, the grade III/IV immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were skin rash and colitis. In addition, biomarker analysis showed that negative PD-L1 expression and SMARCA4 mutation were significantly associated with worse survival outcomes, while no significant associations were observed for TP53, KRAS, or CDKN 2 A mutation as well as TMB. In conclusion, our data suggest that a regimen of toripalimab plus GS could improve PFS and OS with a good safety profile as a first-line treatment option for advanced BTC and warrants further verification.

Keywords: biliary tract cancers; chemotherapy; immunotherapy; phase II clinical trial; programmed death ligand-1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of participants in the study
Figure 2
Figure 2
Characteristics of objective response in patients (A) Change in tumor size from baseline to best response (N = 49). (B) Swimmer chart showing the treatment results (N = 50).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Survival outcomes (A) Progression-free survival curve. (B) Overall survival curve. (C) Progression-free survival for patients with BTCs by PD-L1 expression. (D) Overall survival for patients with BTCs by PD-L1 expression.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of genetic variations associated with treatment response CR, complete response; ECC, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; GBC, gallbladder cancer; ICC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; TMB, tumor mutational burden.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hezel A.F., Deshpande V., Zhu A.X. Genetics of biliary tract cancers and emerging targeted therapies. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28:3531–3540. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Valle J., Wasan H., Palmer D.H., et al. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;362:1273–1281. - PubMed
    1. Valle J.W., Furuse J., Jitlal M., et al. Cisplatin and gemcitabine for advanced biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis of two randomised trials. Ann. Oncol. 2014;25:391–398. - PubMed
    1. Okusaka T., Nakachi K., Fukutomi A., et al. Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with biliary tract cancer: a comparative multicentre study in Japan. Br. J. Cancer. 2010;103:469–474. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morizane C., Okusaka T., Mizusawa J., et al. Combination gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin for advanced/recurrent biliary tract cancer: the FUGA-BT (JCOG1113) randomized phase III clinical trial. Ann. Oncol. 2019;30:1950–1958. - PubMed