Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 8;27(6):447-452.
doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab072.

Evaluation of Liver and Renal Toxicity in Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Somatostatin Receptor Expressing Tumors: A 2-Year Follow-Up

Affiliations

Evaluation of Liver and Renal Toxicity in Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Somatostatin Receptor Expressing Tumors: A 2-Year Follow-Up

Heying Duan et al. Oncologist. .

Abstract

Background: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (SSR) analogs is now an established systemic treatment for neuroendocrine tumors (NET). However, more short- and long-term data about renal and hepatotoxicity is needed. Here we present our experience in this clinical scenario.

Methods: Eighty-six patients with progressive SSR-expressing malignancies underwent PRRT with Lu-177 Dotatate and were followed up for up to 2 years. Laboratory tests were done 1 week before each cycle and every 2 months at follow-up. Hepatic and renal toxicity was determined based on NCI CTCAE V5.0.

Results: 55/86 (64%) patients completed all 4 cycles of PRRT; 18/86 (20.9%) are currently being treated; 13/86 (15.1%) had to discontinue PRRT: 4/13 (31%) due to hematologic toxicity, 9/13 (69%) due to non-PRRT-related comorbidities. Out of the patients who finished treatment, only transient grade 2 toxicities were observed during PRRT: hypoalbuminemia in 5.5% (3/55), and renal toxicity (serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate) in 1.8% (1/55). No grade 3 or 4 liver and renal toxicity occurred. Patients presenting with impaired liver or renal function prior to PRRT, either improved or had stable findings. No deterioration was observed.

Conclusion: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy does not have a negative impact on liver and renal function, even in patients with pre-existing impaired parameters. No grade 3 or 4 hepatic or renal toxicity was identified. Only transient grade 2 hypoalbuminemia in 5.5% and nephrotoxicity in 1.8% of patients were seen during PRRT.

Keywords: Lu-177 dotatate; hepatotoxicity; neuroendocrine tumors; peptide receptor radionuclide therapy; renal toxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Forty-nine-year-old man with G2 small bowel NET presenting with hyperbilirubinemia (1.5 mg/dL) and elevated aminotransferases at baseline. Maximal intensity projection (MIP) images from Ga-68 Dotatate PET at baseline: diffuse metastatic infiltration of the whole liver and multiple bone lesions (A), after 2 cycles: stable disease (B), after completion of PRRT: stable disease (C), 4 months after PRRT: stable disease (D), 7 months after PRRT: stable disease but ascites with sudden increase of bilirubin to 5.5 mg/dL and carcinoid symptomatology, concerning for disease progression (E), 10 months after PRRT and 3 months after chemotherapy: stable disease with progressing ascites; symptomatology and bilirubin improved (F).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Sixty-seven-year-old woman with G2 NET of unknown origin and status post TACE twice, presented for PRRT with elevated ALP (460 U/L). She developed transient grade 1 toxicity (elevated AST and ALT) during treatment. Aspartate aminotransferase and ALT recovered 6 months after last PRRT cycle. Maximal intensity projection images from Ga-68 Dotatate PET prior to PRRT: multiple hepatic, osseous, mediastinal, and retroperitoneal lymph node metastases (A), and 8 months after completion of PRRT: treatment response with decreased number, size, and avidity of known metastases (B).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Creatinine development during PRRT and follow-up in patients with CKD (n = 4).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kulke MH, Mayer RJ.. Carcinoid tumors. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(11):858-868. - PubMed
    1. Rinke A, Wittenberg M, Schade-Brittinger C, et al. . PROMID Study Group . Placebo-controlled, double-blind, prospective, randomized study on the effect of octreotide lar in the control of tumor growth in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine midgut tumors (PROMID): results of long-term survival. Neuroendocrinology. 2017;104(1):26-32. - PubMed
    1. Caplin ME, Pavel M, Ćwikła JB, et al. . CLARINET Investigators . Anti-tumour effects of lanreotide for pancreatic and intestinal neuroendocrine tumours: the CLARINET open-label extension study. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2016;23(3):191-199. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reubi JC. Somatostatin and other peptide receptors as tools for tumor diagnosis and treatment. Neuroendocrinology. 2004;80(Suppl 1):51-56. - PubMed
    1. Kwekkeboom DJ, Kam BL, van Essen M, et al. . Somatostatin-receptor-based imaging and therapy of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2010;17(1):R53-R73. - PubMed

MeSH terms