Background: It is unknown whether traditional medical education ensures competence among fellows in the key skill of breaking bad news (BBN). While simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) has been used to train fourth-year medical students (M4s) in BBN, it is unclear if it adds similar value for fellows.
Objective: We examined the effect of traditional medical training on BBN skills by comparing baseline fellow and M4 skills and confidence and assessed the impact of a BBN SBML curriculum for fellows.
Methods: Fellows training in six programs at Northwestern University from November 2018 to May 2019 were eligible for inclusion. Fellows completed a BBN SBML curriculum including a pretest, individualized feedback using a previously published assessment tool, and ongoing deliberate practice until all achieved a minimum passing standard (MPS). The primary outcomes were checklist and scaled item scores on the assessment tool. Fellow performance was compared to a historical M4 cohort.
Results: Twenty-eight of 38 eligible fellows completed the curriculum and were included for analysis. Fellows reported significantly more experience and confidence in BBN compared to M4s, yet their pre-training performance was significantly worse on checklist (57.1% vs 65.0%, P = .02) and scaled items; only 4% reached the MPS. After training, fellow performance significantly improved on checklist (57.1% to 92.6%, SD = 5.2%, P < .001) and scaled items; all reached the MPS.
Conclusions: Despite higher confidence and BBN clinical experience, fellows performed worse than untrained M4s, confirming that experience is not a proxy for skill. Programs must develop competency-based assessments to ensure entrustment of communication skills.
Keywords: breaking bad news; communication; graduate medical education; palliative care.