A systematic review and network meta-analysis of outcomes after open, mini-laparotomy, hybrid, totally laparoscopic, and robotic living donor right hepatectomy

Marcus Yeow; Shauna Soh; Graham Starkey; Marcos V Perini; Ye-Xin Koh; Ek-Khoon Tan; Chung-Yip Chan; Prema Raj; Brian K P Goh; Tousif Kabir

doi:10.1016/j.surg.2022.03.042

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of outcomes after open, mini-laparotomy, hybrid, totally laparoscopic, and robotic living donor right hepatectomy

Surgery. 2022 Aug;172(2):741-750. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.03.042. Epub 2022 May 27.

Authors

Marcus Yeow¹, Shauna Soh¹, Graham Starkey², Marcos V Perini³, Ye-Xin Koh⁴, Ek-Khoon Tan⁵, Chung-Yip Chan⁶, Prema Raj⁶, Brian K P Goh⁷, Tousif Kabir⁸

Affiliations

¹ Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
² Victorian Liver Transplant Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
³ Victorian Liver Transplant Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
⁴ Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/yexin_koh.
⁵ Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/EkKhoonTan.
⁶ Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
⁷ Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/BrianKGoh.
⁸ Victorian Liver Transplant Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore. Electronic address: tousifing@gmail.com.

PMID: 35644687
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.03.042

Abstract

Background: A systematic review and network meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes after living donor right hepatectomy via the following techniques: conventional open (Open), mini-laparotomy (Minilap), hybrid (Hybrid), totally laparoscopic (Lap), and robotic living donor right hepatectomy (Robotic).

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched from inception to August 2021 for comparative studies of patients who underwent living donor right hepatectomy.

Results: Nineteen studies comprising 2,261 patients were included. Operation time was longer in Lap versus Minilap and Open (mean difference 65.09 min, 95% confidence interval 3.40-126.78 and mean difference 34.81 minutes, 95% confidence interval 1.84-67.78), and in Robotic versus Hybrid, Lap, Minilap, and Open (mean difference 144.72 minutes, 95% confidence interval 89.84-199.59, mean difference 113.24 minutes, 95% confidence interval 53.28-173.20, mean difference 178.33 minutes, 95% confidence interval 105.58-251.08 and mean difference 148.05 minutes, 95% confidence interval 97.35-198.74, respectively). Minilap and Open were associated with higher blood loss compared to Lap (mean difference 258.67 mL, 95% confidence interval 107.00-410.33 and mean difference 314.11 mL, 95% confidence interval 143.84-484.37) and Robotic (mean difference 205.60 mL, 95% confidence interval 45.92-365.28 and mean difference 261.04 mL, 95% confidence interval 84.26-437.82). Open was associated with more overall complications compared to Minilap (odds ratio 2.60, 95% confidence interval 1.11-6.08). Recipient biliary complication rate was higher in Minilap and Open versus Hybrid (odds ratio 3.91, 95% confidence interval 1.13-13.55 and odds ratio 11.42, 95% confidence interval 2.27-57.49), and lower in Open versus Minilap (OR 0.07, 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.34).

Conclusion: Minimally invasive donor right hepatectomy via the various techniques is safe and feasible when performed in high-volume centers, with no major differences in donor complication rates and comparable recipient outcomes once surgeons have mounted the learning curve.

Publication types

Meta-Analysis
Review
Systematic Review

MeSH terms

Hepatectomy* / methods
Humans
Laparoscopy* / adverse effects
Laparotomy* / adverse effects
Length of Stay
Living Donors*
Network Meta-Analysis
Operative Time
Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
Postoperative Complications / etiology
Robotic Surgical Procedures* / adverse effects