Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2022 Mar 29;11(3):188-195.
doi: 10.1007/s13691-022-00545-y. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Conversion surgery for initially unresectable advanced biliary tract cancer treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy: a case report and literature review

Affiliations
Case Reports

Conversion surgery for initially unresectable advanced biliary tract cancer treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy: a case report and literature review

Ryoichi Miyamoto et al. Int Cancer Conf J. .

Abstract

Recently, the number of reports describing patients with initially unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC) who underwent resection in the form of conversion surgery is increasing. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) combination therapy has been reported to significantly prolong the median survival time from 8.1 to 11.7 months compared with conventional gemcitabine therapy in patients with unresectable BTC. We report the case of a patient with unresectable BTC who underwent conversion surgery with a partial response to GC combination therapy. A 78-year-old woman was diagnosed with unresectable BTC with invasion of the right hepatic artery by lymph node metastasis and liver metastases. The patient received GC combination therapy. After 6 cycles of chemotherapy, the patient achieved a partial response. The radiological findings revealed a marked shrinkage in the primary lesion and the disappearance of lymph node and liver metastases. Therefore, the patient underwent conversion surgery, including biliary tract resection and regional lymph node dissection. For postoperative follow-up, the patient was monitored without receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient had not exhibited recurrence during the 12-month follow-up period. We report the case of a patient with unresectable BTC who underwent conversion surgery with a partial response to GC combination therapy.

Keywords: Biliary tract cancer; Cholangiocarcinoma; Conversion surgery; Gemcitabine plus cisplatin; Spyglass.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThere are no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a, b Enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a 45 mm tumor that extended biliary duct cancer from the distal bile duct to the hilar region of the bile duct (arrow). c Swollen lymph node invaded the right hepatic artery (arrowhead)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) showed an irregular stricture from the distal bile duct to the hilar region of the bile duct. b, c Liver metastases were suspected in the hepatobiliary phase and diffusion-weighted image (arrowheads)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The clinical course, including the schedules of chemotherapy, operation, and radiological examinations, is shown. The patient received 6 cycles of the regimen for 5 months. One month after the final administration of chemotherapy, the patient underwent conversion surgery. Abbreviations: CA19-9 carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CEA carcinoembryonic antigen
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a, b Enhanced abdominal CT revealed that the tumor size was decreased from 45 to 15 mm and was localized in the junction of the cystic and common hepatic ducts (arrow). c Direct invasion of the lymph node to the right hepatic artery was improved (arrowhead)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Peroral cholangioscopy (The Spyglass Direct Visualization System, Boston Scientific Corp, Natick, MA, USA) showed that the tumor localized in the junction of cystic and common hepatic ducts. In terms of biopsy of the distal bile duct and the hilar region of the bile duct, no malignancy was confirmed. Abbreviations: Bant/post anterior/posterior segmental bile duct; Bl left hepatic duct; Bc caudate lobe bile duct; Bm middle bile duct; Bi inferior bile duct
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
a, b Positron emission tomography with 18F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG PET)/CT revealed abnormal uptake in the tumor with an SUVmax of 5.8 (arrow), and abnormal uptake in the lymph nodes and liver metastases were not observed
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
a Extrahepatic duct resection, choledochojejunostomy and regional lymph node dissection were performed. Abbreviations: RHA right hepatic artery; LHA left hepatic artery; PHA proper hepatic artery; PV portal vein; GDA gastroduodenal artery; CBD common bile duct; GB gallbladder. b Direct invasion of the lymph node to the right hepatic artery was not observed. Abbreviations: CHD common hepatic duct; RHA right hepatic artery; LHA left hepatic artery; PHA proper hepatic artery; PV portal vein; IVC inferior vena cava
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
a Macroscopically, a 10 × 10 mm tumor was observed at the junction of the cystic and common hepatic ducts. Resected margins, including hepatic-side and duodenum-side margins, were negative. The precise anatomy of the cystic duct in the lower-right segment was described. b Histopathologically, the tumor displayed well-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. c Infiltration of inflammatory cells in the fibrous tissue around the cancer cells was observed, suggesting the presence of necrotic carcinoma cells

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Randi G, Malvezzi M, Levi F, et al. Epidemiology of biliary tract cancers: an update. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:146–159. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn533. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hori M, Matsuda T, Shibata A, et al. Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2009: a study of 32 population-based cancer registries for the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015;45:884–891. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv088. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, et al. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1273–1281. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908721. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morizane C, Okusaka T, Mizusawa J, et al. Combination gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin for advanced/recurrent biliary tract cancer: the FUGA-BT (JCOG1113) randomized phase III clinical trial. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:1950–1958. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz402. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sakai D, Kanai M, Kobayashi S, et al. Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine, cisplatin plus S-1 (GCS) versus gemcitabine, cisplatin (GC) for advanced biliary tract cancer (KHBO1401-MITSUBA) Ann Oncol. 2018;29:viii205–viii270. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy282. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources