Using text and charts to provide social norm feedback to general practices with high overall and high broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing: a series of national randomised controlled trials

Trials. 2022 Jun 18;23(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06373-y.

Abstract

Background: Sending a social norms feedback letter to general practitioners who are high prescribers of antibiotics has been shown to reduce antibiotic prescribing. The 2017-9 Quality Premium for primary care in England sets a target for broad-spectrum prescribing, which should be at or below 10% of total antibiotic prescribing. We tested a social norm feedback letter that targeted broad-spectrum prescribing and the addition of a chart to a text-only letter that targeted overall prescribing.

Methods: We conducted three 2-armed randomised controlled trials, on different groups of practices: Trial A compared a broad-spectrum message and chart to the standard-practice overall prescribing letter (practices whose percentage of broad-spectrum prescribing was above 10% and who had relatively high overall prescribing). Trial C compared a broad-spectrum message and a chart to a no-letter control (practices whose percentage of broad-spectrum prescribing was above 10% and who had relatively moderate overall prescribing). Trial B compared an overall-prescribing message with a chart to the standard practice overall letter (practices whose percentage of broad-spectrum prescribing was below 10% but who had relatively high overall prescribing). Letters were posted to general practitioners, timed to be received on 1 November 2018. The primary outcomes were practices' percentage of broad-spectrum prescribing (trials A and C) and overall antibiotic prescribing (trial B) each month from November 2018 to April 2019 (all weighted by the number and characteristics of patients registered in the practice).

Results: We randomly assigned 1909 practices; 58 closed or merged during the trial, leaving 1851 practices: 385 in trial A, 674 in trial C, and 792 in trial B. AR(1) models showed that there were no statistically significant differences in our primary outcome measures: trial A β = - .199, p = .13; trial C β = .006, p = .95; trial B β = - .0021, p = .81. In all three trials, there were statistically significant time trends, showing that overall antibiotic prescribing and total broad-spectrum prescribing were decreasing.

Conclusion: Our broad-spectrum feedback letters had no effect on broad-spectrum prescribing; adding a bar chart to a text-only letter had no effect on overall antibiotic prescribing. Broad-spectrum and overall prescribing were both decreasing over time.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03862794. March 5, 2019.

Keywords: Antibiotics; Antimicrobial resistance; Behavioural intervention; Broad-spectrum prescribing; Data visualisation; Feedback; Messenger effect; Prescribing rates; Primary care; Social norms.

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents* / adverse effects
  • Feedback
  • General Practice*
  • Humans
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Social Norms

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT03862794