Tracking transitional probabilities and segmenting auditory sequences are dissociable processes in adults and neonates
- PMID: 35772033
- DOI: 10.1111/desc.13300
Tracking transitional probabilities and segmenting auditory sequences are dissociable processes in adults and neonates
Abstract
Since speech is a continuous stream with no systematic boundaries between words, how do pre-verbal infants manage to discover words? A proposed solution is that they might use the transitional probability between adjacent syllables, which drops at word boundaries. Here, we tested the limits of this mechanism by increasing the size of the word-unit to four syllables, and its automaticity by testing asleep neonates. Using markers of statistical learning in neonates' EEG, compared to adult behavioral performances in the same task, we confirmed that statistical learning is automatic enough to be efficient even in sleeping neonates. We also revealed that: (1) Successfully tracking transition probabilities (TP) in a sequence is not sufficient to segment it. (2) Prosodic cues, as subtle as subliminal pauses, enable to recover words segmenting capacities. (3) Adults' and neonates' capacities to segment streams seem remarkably similar despite the difference of maturation and expertise. Finally, we observed that learning increased the overall similarity of neural responses across infants during exposure to the stream, providing a novel neural marker to monitor learning. Thus, from birth, infants are equipped with adult-like tools, allowing them to extract small coherent word-like units from auditory streams, based on the combination of statistical analyses and auditory parsing cues. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: Successfully tracking transitional probabilities in a sequence is not always sufficient to segment it. Word segmentation solely based on transitional probability is limited to bi- or tri-syllabic elements. Prosodic cues, as subtle as subliminal pauses, enable to recover chunking capacities in sleeping neonates and awake adults for quadriplets.
Keywords: EEG; language learning; neonates; prosody; sequence learning; statistical learning.
© 2022 The Authors. Developmental Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Sleeping neonates track transitional probabilities in speech but only retain the first syllable of words.Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 15;12(1):4391. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08411-w. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35292694 Free PMC article.
-
Newborns are sensitive to multiple cues for word segmentation in continuous speech.Dev Sci. 2019 Jul;22(4):e12802. doi: 10.1111/desc.12802. Epub 2019 Feb 20. Dev Sci. 2019. PMID: 30681763
-
Statistical language learning in neonates revealed by event-related brain potentials.BMC Neurosci. 2009 Mar 13;10:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-21. BMC Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19284661 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating the neural correlates of continuous speech computation with frequency-tagged neuroelectric responses.Neuroimage. 2009 Jan 15;44(2):509-19. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.015. Epub 2008 Sep 27. Neuroimage. 2009. PMID: 18929668
-
The relationship between neural phase entrainment and statistical word-learning: A scoping review.Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1399-1419. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02425-9. Epub 2023 Dec 7. Psychon Bull Rev. 2024. PMID: 38062317 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Sleeping neonates track transitional probabilities in speech but only retain the first syllable of words.Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 15;12(1):4391. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08411-w. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35292694 Free PMC article.
-
Humans parsimoniously represent auditory sequences by pruning and completing the underlying network structure.Elife. 2023 May 2;12:e86430. doi: 10.7554/eLife.86430. Elife. 2023. PMID: 37129367 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Horizon Associative Learning Explains Human Sensitivity to Statistical and Network Structures in Auditory Sequences.J Neurosci. 2024 Apr 3;44(14):e1369232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1369-23.2024. J Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38408873 Free PMC article.
-
Pupil diameter as an indicator of sound pair familiarity after statistically structured auditory sequence.Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 16;14(1):8739. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59302-1. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38627572 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Andrillon, T., & Kouider, S. (2016). Implicit memory for words heard during sleep. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2016(1), niw014.
-
- Andrillon, T., Poulsen, A. T., Hansen, L. K., Léger, D. L., & Kouider, S. (2016). Neural markers of responsiveness to the environment in human sleep. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(24), 6583-6596.
-
- Bagou, O., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (2018). Lexical segmentation in artificial word learning: The effects of converging sublexical cues. Language and Speech, 61(1), 3-30.
-
- Batterink, L. J., & Choi, D. (2021). Optimizing steady-state responses to index statistical learning: Response to Benjamin and colleagues. Cortex, 142, 379-388.
-
- Batterink, L. J., & Zhang, S. (2022). Simple statistical regularities presented during sleep are detected but not retained. Neuropsychologia, 164, 108106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108106
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
