Background: Many techniques are used for digital nerve repair, most commonly coaptation by sutures. Nerve repairs must be strong while offering an environment for nerve regeneration. Sutures can damage the nerve and thereby limit growth and regeneration. Sutures can rip and cause sudden catastrophic failure. Fibrin glue and conduit-wraps allow a good environment for growth, but neither provides much strength. A benefit to conduit repair would arise if the repair maintained integrity after the peak load so that the path for regrowth stayed in place. The goal for this study was to determine whether conduit with glue provides continued strength after a maximum load is reached.
Methods: Digital cadaveric nerves were harvested and repaired with 2 epineurial sutures, conduit, and fibrin glue in all combinations. Tests to failure were performed, gap displacement between nerve ends recorded, and the postpeak load energy to dissociation of the nerve and conduit was calculated.
Results: Conduit with glue and 2 sutures at the end had the greatest energy and displacement after the peak load but was not significantly different than conduit with glue and 1 suture. Conduit with glue alone obtained statistically the same displacement as conduit with glue and 2 sutures. Conduit, with or without glue, and 2 sutures was statistically the same as suture only repair for peak load.
Conclusion: Conduit/wrap maintains a load capacity and a path for nerve regeneration after the peak. Suture at the ends of conduit, not at the coaptation site, reduces damage at the point of injury.
Keywords: anatomy; arthritis; basic science; biomechanics; diagnosis; hand; nerve; nerve injury; nerve reconstruction; nerve regeneration; post traumatic.