Portable wireless and fibreless fNIRS headband compares favorably to a stationary headcap-based system

PLoS One. 2022 Jul 14;17(7):e0269654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269654. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

This study's purpose is to characterize the performance of a prototype functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) headband meant to enable quick and easy measurements from the sensorimotor cortices. The fact that fNIRS is well-suited to ergonomic designs (i.e., their ability to be made wireless, their relative robustness to movement artifacts among other characteristics) has resulted in many recent examples of novel ergonomic fNIRS systems; however, the optical nature of fNIRS measurement presents an inherent challenge to measurement at areas of the brain underlying haired parts of the head. It is for this reason that the majority of ergonomic fNIRS systems that have been developed to date target the prefrontal cortex. In the present study we compared the performance of a novel, portable fNIRS headband compared with a stationary full headcap fNIRS system to measure sensorimotor activity during simple upper- and lower-extremity tasks, in healthy individuals >50 years of age. Both fNIRS systems demonstrated the expected pattern of hemodynamic activity in both upper- and lower-extremity tasks, and a comparison of the contrast-to-noise ratio between the two systems suggests the prototype fNIRS headband is non-inferior to a full head cap fNIRS system regarding the ability to detect a physiological response at the sensorimotor cortex during these tasks. These results suggest the use of a wireless and fibreless fNIRS design is feasible for measurement at the sensorimotor cortex.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Artifacts
  • Humans
  • Movement / physiology
  • Prefrontal Cortex / diagnostic imaging
  • Prefrontal Cortex / physiology
  • Sensorimotor Cortex* / physiology
  • Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared* / methods

Grants and funding

CF, TI, and ML were supported by funding from Mitacs Accelerate held by SB; CF and CH were supported through training awards from NSERC; CF was supported through a training award from Research Nova Scotia. Axem Neurotechnology provided support for the work through the contribution of hardware (fNIRS prototypes) and salary support for CF, TI, ML, EH and MS. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.