Purpose: To assess which cases should be assorted exclusively to high-volume surgeons and identify when should a cataract surgeon seek assistance from a senior colleague.
Methods: The medical records of 2853 patients with age-related cataract were reviewed. Preoperative risk factors were documented for each case, and they were divided into surgeons who had more (> 400 surgeries/year) or less experience (< 400 surgeries/year). Ophthalmology residents were excluded from this review. The cases that involved posterior capsule rupture, dropped nucleus, zonular dehiscence and anterior capsular tear with or without vitreous loss were defined as "complicated".
Results: From the 3247 cataract extraction surgeries that were reviewed, we were unable to identify any statistically significant difference in the complication rates between the two surgeon groups. In the stepwise regression analysis, both groups supported advanced age (> 85) and mature cataracts with up to fourfold odds ratios (OR). Low-volume surgeons had a fivefold OR in the presence of phacodonesis and a fourfold OR in the case of posterior polar cataract. Finally, the low- and high-volume groups had their highest complication rates in the cumulative four and five risk factors, respectively.
Conclusion: In the presence of advanced age, mature cataracts, phacodonesis and posterior polar cataract, the complication rates appear to be higher for the less experienced surgeons. Meticulous preoperative assessment with detailed documentation of each patient's risk factors can result in fewer complications. The medical complexity of each case can be used as indicator of whether a more experienced surgeon should perform the surgery or not.
Keywords: Cataract surgery; Phacoemulsification; Risk factors; Surgeon volume.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.