Peer Support at the Intersection of Disability and Opioid (Mis)Use: Key Stakeholders Provide Essential Considerations

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9664. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159664.

Abstract

Individuals with disabilities may experience higher rates of opioid/substance use disorders (OUD/SUD) than other individuals and are likely vulnerable to unmet treatment needs. Peer support may be beneficial to these individuals, given the evidence of benefits in target populations with similar needs and the potential for overcoming barriers to treatment suggested in the available literature. The objective of this exploratory study was to specify essential considerations in adapting peer support for this population. Diverse key stakeholders (n = 16) were interviewed to explore the experiences, needs, and available supports for individuals with disabilities and OUD/SUD. A Peer Support Work Group including members with lived experience advised each component of the study. Semi-structured interview data were content analyzed and memos generated to summarize themes related to the research question. Participants reported extensive professional and personal experience in human services, disability, and recovery. Emergent themes included the importance of accessibility and model fit, the notion of "peerness" and peer match, and essential aspects of peer recruitment, training, and support. An accessible, acceptable, effective model of peer support requires particular attention to the needs of this diverse and varied population, and the contexts in which they are identified, referred, and engaged in services.

Keywords: disability; intersectionality; interventions; opioid use disorder; peer-led; substance use disorder; well-being.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Analgesics, Opioid / therapeutic use
  • Disabled Persons*
  • Health Services Needs and Demand
  • Humans
  • Opioid-Related Disorders* / epidemiology
  • Peer Group

Substances

  • Analgesics, Opioid

Grants and funding

This research was supported by grant 90DPGE0007 to Brandeis University from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living’s National Institute for Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR). The contents of this paper do not necessarily represent the policy of NIDILRR, ACL, or HHS, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.