Comprehensive analysis of mutational profile and prognostic significance of complex glandular pattern in lung adenocarcinoma

Jinsong Bai; Chaoqiang Deng; Qiang Zheng; Di Li; Fangqiu Fu; Yuan Li; Yang Zhang; Haiquan Chen

doi:10.21037/tlcr-22-127

Comprehensive analysis of mutational profile and prognostic significance of complex glandular pattern in lung adenocarcinoma

Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2022 Jul;11(7):1337-1347. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-22-127.

Authors

Jinsong Bai^#^{1

2

3}, Chaoqiang Deng^#^{1

2

3}, Qiang Zheng^{2

3

4}, Di Li^{1

2

3}, Fangqiu Fu^{1

2

3}, Yuan Li^{2

3

4}, Yang Zhang^{1

2

3}, Haiquan Chen^{1

2

3}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Thoracic Surgery and State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
² Institute of Thoracic Oncology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
³ Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
⁴ Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.

^# Contributed equally.

Abstract

Background: Complex glandular pattern (CGP) was included as high-grade pattern in the new grading system proposed by The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. We aimed to investigate the mutational profile and validate the prognostic significance and proper cut-off value to distinguish the aggressive behavior of CGP.

Methods: CGP was defined as nests of tumor cells with sieve-like perforation, fused glands with irregular borders or back-to-back glands without intervening stroma. Patients were categorized into four groups according to the percentage of CGP component (0%, 1-19%, 20-49%, 50-100%). Cox's proportional hazards model was applied to analyze recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results: A total of 950 patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma was enrolled. The most frequent driver mutation in this cohort was EGFR and was detected in 624 (65.7%) patients. EGFR mutation was more frequently observed in patients with <20% CGP than in patients with ≥20% CGP (73.6% vs. 60.2%), while KRAS mutation and ALK rearrangement was significantly associated with ≥20% CGP. Patients with 20% or greater CGP exhibited significant worse RFS (P<0.001) and OS (P<0.001) than their counterparts. Moreover, the multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed that CGP (≥20%) was a risk factor for a worse RFS (P=0.001) and OS (P<0.001) independent of staging and gene mutation. Smaller portion of CGP (<20%) were comparable in RFS and OS to those without CGP (0%). There was also no significant difference in RFS and OS between the 20-49% and ≥50% group.

Conclusions: Our study provided mutational profile of patients with different CGP, validated CGP as a negative prognostic factor and provided extra evidences for the optimal cut-off value of CGP percentage.

Keywords: International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer grading system (IASLC grading system) grading system; complex glandular pattern (CGP); driver mutations; pulmonary adenocarcinoma.