A single residue confers selective loss of sugar sensing in wrynecks
- PMID: 35985327
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.07.059
A single residue confers selective loss of sugar sensing in wrynecks
Abstract
Sensory receptors evolve, and changes to their response profiles can directly impact sensory perception and affect diverse behaviors, from mate choice to foraging decisions.1-3 Although receptor sensitivities can be highly contingent on changes occurring early in a lineage's evolutionary history,4 subsequent shifts in a species' behavior and ecology may exert selective pressure to modify and even reverse sensory receptor capabilities.5-7 Neither the extent to which sensory reversion occurs nor the mechanisms underlying such shifts is well understood. Using receptor profiling and behavioral tests, we uncover both an early gain and an unexpected subsequent loss of sugar sensing in woodpeckers, a primarily insectivorous family of landbirds.8,9 Our analyses show that, similar to hummingbirds10 and songbirds,4 the ancestors of woodpeckers repurposed their T1R1-T1R3 savory receptor to detect sugars. Importantly, whereas woodpeckers seem to have broadly retained this ability, our experiments demonstrate that wrynecks (an enigmatic ant-eating group sister to all other woodpeckers) selectively lost sugar sensing through a novel mechanism involving a single amino acid change in the T1R3 transmembrane domain. The identification of this molecular microswitch responsible for a sensory shift in taste receptors provides an example of the molecular basis of a sensory reversion in vertebrates and offers novel insights into structure-function relationships during sensory receptor evolution.
Keywords: T1R taste receptor; allosteric site; evolutionary shift; microswitch; reversion; sensory system evolution; woodpeckers.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Synergism, Bifunctionality, and the Evolution of a Gradual Sensory Trade-off in Hummingbird Taste Receptors.Mol Biol Evol. 2022 Feb 3;39(2):msab367. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab367. Mol Biol Evol. 2022. PMID: 34978567 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution of the primate glutamate taste sensor from a nucleotide sensor.Curr Biol. 2021 Oct 25;31(20):4641-4649.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Aug 26. Curr Biol. 2021. PMID: 34450087
-
Electrophysiological responses to sugars and amino acids in the nucleus of the solitary tract of type 1 taste receptor double-knockout mice.J Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb 1;123(2):843-859. doi: 10.1152/jn.00584.2019. Epub 2020 Jan 8. J Neurophysiol. 2020. PMID: 31913749 Free PMC article.
-
The functional role of the T1R family of receptors in sweet taste and feeding.Physiol Behav. 2011 Nov 30;105(1):14-26. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.02.030. Epub 2011 Mar 2. Physiol Behav. 2011. PMID: 21376068 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Taste information derived from T1R-expressing taste cells in mice.Biochem J. 2016 Mar 1;473(5):525-36. doi: 10.1042/BJ20151015. Biochem J. 2016. PMID: 26912569 Review.
Cited by
-
Adaptive evolution and loss of a putative magnetoreceptor in passerines.Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Feb 14;291(2016):20232308. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2308. Epub 2024 Feb 7. Proc Biol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38320616 Free PMC article.
-
Sensory collectives in natural systems.Elife. 2023 Nov 29;12:e88028. doi: 10.7554/eLife.88028. Elife. 2023. PMID: 38019274 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
