Background: Renal colic is a common emergency centre (EC) complaint worldwide, but its epidemiology and strategies for evaluation and treatment have been little reported in Africa. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study aimed at evaluating the radiological investigations, management, and analysis of demographic characteristics of patients with urinary system stones who visited the EC.
Method: A 3-year retrospective study of a total of 435 patients with acute renal colic who underwent radiologic investigations was included in this study. The overall positive stone rate, stone location, size, and hydronephrosis grade were assessed. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound were evaluated using patients with both an ultrasound and a non-contrast CT (NCCT).
Results: The mean age of the patients was 34.7years; males accounted for 71.3% (n = 310), while females were 28.7% (n = 125). Urolithiasis was found in 63.4% of the cases, 71.3% of males and 28.7% of the females had a stone diagnosis (P < 0001). There was no statistically significant association between age and stone diagnosis (P > 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of USG were 86.1% and 94%, respectively. Seventy-two percent of the cases had ureteral stones (29% in proximal, 25% in UVJ, 9% in mid, and 9% in distal ureter), followed by 28% having renal stones (19% calyces and 9% in renal pelvis). The mean size of the stone was 5.9±1.8, half of the cases harbour stone size <5mm, followed by 30% in 5mm-1cm.
Conclusion: Due to the scarcity of well-equipped tertiary care hospitals and the low socioeconomic status of the patients living in Sub-Saharan Africa, Ultrasound can be the initial investigation of choice because it is safe, cheap, and may help guide diagnosis and the need for further imaging. However, NCCT remains the gold standard diagnosis of choice for acute flank pain.
Keywords: Emergency centre; Renal colic; Urolithiasis.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of African Federation for Emergency Medicine.