Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan-Dec;14(1):2113717.
doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2113717.

Intestinal phages interact with bacteria and are involved in human diseases

Affiliations
Review

Intestinal phages interact with bacteria and are involved in human diseases

Han Shuwen et al. Gut Microbes. 2022 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

EMBL-EBI The European Bioinformatics Institute; E. coli Escherichia coli; E. faecalis Enterobacter faecalis; B. fragilis Bacteroides fragilis; B. vulgatus Bacteroides vulgatus; SaPIs Staphylococcus aureus pathogenicity islands; ARGs Antibiotic resistance genes; STEC Shiga toxigenic E. coli; Stx Shiga toxin; BLAST Basic Local Alignment Search Tool; TSST-1 Toxic shock toxin 1; RBPs Receptor-binding proteins; LPS lipopolysaccharide; OMVs Outer membrane vesicles; PT Phosphorothioate; BREX Bacteriophage exclusion; OCR Overcome classical restriction; Pgl Phage growth limitation; DISARM Defense island system associated with restrictionmodification; R-M system Restriction-modification system; BREX system Bacteriophage exclusion system; CRISPR Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats; Cas CRISPR-associated; PAMs Prospacer adjacent motifs; crRNA CRISPR RNA; SIE; OMPs; Superinfection exclusion; Outer membrane proteins; Abi Abortive infection; TA Toxin-antitoxin; TLR Toll-like receptor; APCs Antigen-presenting cells; DSS Dextran sulfate sodium; IELs Intraepithelial lymphocytes; FMT Fecal microbiota transfer; IFN-γ Interferon-gamma; IBD Inflammatory bowel disease; AgNPs Silver nanoparticles; MDSC Myeloid-derived suppressor cell; CRC Colorectal cancer; VLPs Virus-like particles; TMP Tape measure protein; PSMB4 Proteasome subunit beta type-4; ALD Alcohol-related liver disease; GVHD Graft-versus-host disease; ROS Reactive oxygen species; RA Rheumatoid arthritis; CCP Cyclic citrullinated protein; AMGs Accessory metabolic genes; T1DM Type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM Type 2 diabetes mellitus; SCFAs Short-chain fatty acids; GLP-1 Glucagon-like peptide-1; A. baumannii Acinetobacter baumannii; CpG Deoxycytidylinate-phosphodeoxyguanosine; PEG Polyethylene glycol; MetS Metabolic syndrome; OprM Outer membrane porin M.

Keywords: Intestinal microbiota; bacteria; phage; phage therapy; phage-related diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Effects of bacteriophage inoculation on the intestinal flora. ① Phages T4, F1, B40-8, and VD13 lysed only their susceptible bacteria E. coli, C. sporogenes, B. fragilis and E. faecalis. Phages directly affect susceptible bacteria through ① specific lysis, ② horizontal gene transfer and ③ encoding virulence genes, resulting in changes in intestinal bacteria and a decrease in their number. ④ The type of metabolites secreted may change due to the change in bacterial characteristics, and the total amount of metabolites secreted may decrease due to the decrease in bacterial number. ⑤ Changes in the abundance of bacteria and their metabolites can affect the intestinal environment and the growth of surrounding bacteria.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Antagonistic mechanisms of intestinal bacteria against phage invasion. ① Bacteria can prevent phage adsorption by changing and hiding receptors. ② Bacteria destroy the DNA of the invading phage through the restrictive modification-methylation pathway and inhibit the replication and integration of phage genes. ③ Bacteria degrade phage DNA by the CRISPR-Cas system. ④ Bacteria prevent reinfection by encoding superinfection immune system proteins. ⑤ Bacteria interfere with phage adsorption, injection, replication, assembly and release through the Abi system, leading to failure of phage lysis.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The cause of the persistent coexistence of phages and bacteria in the intestinal tract. ① The distribution of bacteriophages and bacteria is spatially heterogeneous. There are no phages in the intestinal villi, few phages in the intestinal mucosa, and a large number of phages in the intestinal lumen. The phage density in the intestinal tract presents a mucosal-lumenal gradient, providing a place for bacteria to avoid phage attack. ② The specific interaction between phages and bacteria, the competition between defense and anti-defense systems, and the way in which genes are shared to form new mutations or new species promote coevolution.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Intestinal phages induce the development of diseases by regulating and increasing the release of bacterial exotoxins, regulating bacterial community metabolism, and initiating immune responses. Changes in intestinal phages, bacteria and their metabolites through fecal microbiota transfer may help alleviate diseases. Changes in bacterial metabolites closely related to disease may be able to be used as markers for disease surveillance.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Application of phage in the treatment of intestinal diseases. ① Using the nature of phage, a phage cocktail is made to target bacterial infection. ② The structure of phages can be modified by switching phage modules or by applying CRISPR gene editing technology to change the intestinal bacterial host or enhance its antagonism to the intestinal bacterial host. ③ Preparation of phage display vaccines and phage DNA vaccines to enhance specific immune responses. ④Using phage to treat specific intestinal or other bacteria with targeted delivery of disease treatment drugs. For example, glucan nanoparticles are covalently linked to azide-modified phages, polyethylene glycol capsid-modified phages, phage-liposome complexes and other anti-colorectal cancer drugs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kåhrström CT, Pariente N, Weiss U.. Intestinal microbiota in health and disease. Nature. 2016;535(7610):47. - PubMed
    1. Eckburg PB, Bik EM, Bernstein CN, Purdom E, Dethlefsen L, Sargent M, Gill SR, Nelson KE, Relman DA. Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science. 2005;308(5728):1635–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Camarillo-Guerrero LF, Almeida A, Rangel-Pineros G, Finn RD, Lawley TD. Massive expansion of human gut bacteriophage diversity. Cell. 2021;184(4):1098–1109.e1099. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liang G, Zhao C, Zhang H, Mattei L, Sherrill-Mix S, Bittinger K, Kessler LR, Wu GD, Baldassano RN, DeRusso P, et al. The stepwise assembly of the neonatal virome is modulated by breastfeeding. Nature. 2020;581(7809):470–474. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reyes A, Haynes M, Hanson N, Angly FE, Heath AC, Rohwer F, Gordon JI. Viruses in the faecal microbiota of monozygotic twins and their mothers. Nature. 2010;466(7304):334–338. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Major Science and Technology Projects for Medical and Health Care of Zhejiang Province (No. WKJ-ZJ-2013) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82072624).