A comparison of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of naturally acquired shigellosis in rhesus and pigtailed macaques (Macaca mulatta and nemestrina)

J Med Primatol. 2022 Dec;51(6):374-380. doi: 10.1111/jmp.12608. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

Abstract

Background: Shigella spp. are common enteric pathogens in captive non-human primates. Treatment of symptomatic infections involves supportive care and antibiotic therapy, typically with an empirical choice of antibiotic.

Methods: Twenty-four clinically ill, Shigella PCR-positive animals were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: single-dose ceftiofur crystalline free acid (CCFA), single-dose azithromycin gavage, a 5-day tapering azithromycin dose, or 7-day course of enrofloxacin. We hypothesized that all antimicrobial therapies would have similar efficacy.

Results: Animals in all groups cleared Shigella, based on fecal PCR, and had resolution of clinical signs 2 weeks after treatment. Eight out of nine clinically ill and PCR-positive animals tested negative by fecal culture.

Conclusions: Single-dose CCFA, single-dose azithromycin, and a 5-day tapering course of azithromycin all performed as well as a 7-day course of enrofloxacin in eliminating Shigella infection. Fecal PCR may be a better diagnostic than culture for Shigella.

Keywords: Shigella; non-human primate; shigella antibiotic.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Azithromycin / therapeutic use
  • Dysentery, Bacillary* / drug therapy
  • Dysentery, Bacillary* / veterinary
  • Enrofloxacin / therapeutic use
  • Macaca mulatta
  • Macaca nemestrina
  • Shigella*

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Enrofloxacin
  • Azithromycin
  • ceftiofur