Pharmacological prevention strategy for capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome: A network meta-analysis of randomized control trials

Dermatol Ther. 2022 Oct;35(10):e15774. doi: 10.1111/dth.15774. Epub 2022 Aug 30.

Abstract

Capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is common in clinical practice. There are many regimens used to prevent HFS. However, the most effective preventive regimen has not yet been identified. Thus, we conducted a network meta-analysis to investigate the best preventive regimen for HFS. The PRISMA-NMA guidelines were used in this study. The PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched. The main endpoint was set as HFS of National Cancer Institute grade 2 or more. We included only randomized control trials. The P-score was used to rank the regimens. Among all the regimens, topical silymarin had the best preventive ability compared with the placebo (OR: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.01-0.71). The other identified effective regimen included pyridoxine (400 mg) and celecoxib; compared with the placebo, the odds ratio was 0.27 (95% CI: 0.08-0.91) and 0.41 (95% CI: 0.18-0.95), respectively. Topical silymarin is the most useful regimen for preventing capecitabine-induced HFS.

Keywords: capecitabine; chemotherapy; dermatitis; hand-foot syndrome; network meta-analysis.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis

MeSH terms

  • Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic / adverse effects
  • Capecitabine / adverse effects
  • Celecoxib
  • Hand-Foot Syndrome* / drug therapy
  • Hand-Foot Syndrome* / etiology
  • Hand-Foot Syndrome* / prevention & control
  • Humans
  • Network Meta-Analysis
  • Pyridoxine / therapeutic use
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Silymarin*

Substances

  • Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
  • Silymarin
  • Capecitabine
  • Celecoxib
  • Pyridoxine