Tokyo Guidelines (TG18) for Acute Cholangitis Provide Improved Specificity and Accuracy Compared to Fellow Assessment

Amit Hudgi; Anabel L Cartelle; Amr Ahmed; Ahmad Alkaddour; Carlos Palacio; Kenneth J Vega; John Erikson L Yap

doi:10.7759/cureus.27527

Tokyo Guidelines (TG18) for Acute Cholangitis Provide Improved Specificity and Accuracy Compared to Fellow Assessment

Cureus. 2022 Jul 31;14(7):e27527. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27527. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Authors

Amit Hudgi¹, Anabel L Cartelle², Amr Ahmed¹, Ahmad Alkaddour², Carlos Palacio³, Kenneth J Vega², John Erikson L Yap²

Affiliations

¹ Internal Medicine, Medical College of Georgia - Augusta University, Augusta, USA.
² Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Georgia - Augusta University, Augusta, USA.
³ Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Jacksonville, USA.

Abstract

Background Acute cholangitis results in significant mortality unless treated promptly. The diagnostic grading criteria of the 2018 Tokyo Guidelines (TG18) are used worldwide as the standard for acute cholangitis (AC) management but validation in clinical practice is required. Aim Use of the Tokyo 2018 (TG18) guidelines in improving the diagnostic accuracy and early detection of AC compared to fellow clinical assessment. Methods A retrospective review of patient records from 1/2010-9/2019 seen at Augusta University - Medical College of Georgia with the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) code "cholangitis" and/or ICD-10 codes "acute cholangitis, other cholangitis, and calculus of bile duct with cholangitis" was performed. Inclusion criteria were gastroenterology inpatient consult fellow evaluation and clinical diagnosis of AC. A definitive diagnosis of AC was determined following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). TG18 scoring for AC was then performed, categorized as either diagnostic/non-diagnostic, and compared to fellow clinical assessments following definitive diagnosis post-ERCP. Data were analyzed with chi-square testing. Results Two hundred six patients were identified using ICD codes. Ninety-one met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The mean patient age of the overall group was 67 years old (standard deviation of 13.3 years) with males comprising 69% and non-Hispanic white 56% of the study group. TG18 criteria assessment had a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 63% for patients with AC post ERCP (p <0.05). TG18 accuracy was 81%. In comparison, fellow clinical suspicion had a sensitivity of 90.3% and specificity of 0% (NS). Fellow accuracy was 71%. No difference in fellows' diagnosis of suspected AC was noted based on the training year. Conclusion Application of the TG18 criteria for AC reduces the false positive rate and improves diagnostic accuracy, thus decreasing costs along with avoiding unnecessary ERCPs with associated complications.

Keywords: acute cholangitis; choledocholithiasis; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp); in-training fellows; tokyo guidelines (tg18).