Treatment of peritonsillar abscess. A prospective study of aspiration vs incision and drainage

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987 Sep;113(9):984-6. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1987.01860090082025.

Abstract

A prospective clinical study was performed on 62 patients with peritonsillar abscesses at Ben Taub General Hospital, Houston. The abscesses were treated with either incision and drainage or needle aspiration alone. The recovery period was similar in both groups, but two of the 41 patients initially treated with aspiration had an immediate recurrence. These were successfully treated with subsequent incision and drainage. The advantages of needle aspiration alone as the primary drainage procedure outweigh the acceptably low failure rate, making it the initial procedure of choice.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Controlled Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Abscess / surgery
  • Abscess / therapy*
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Child
  • Drainage*
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Palatine Tonsil*
  • Pharyngeal Diseases / surgery
  • Pharyngeal Diseases / therapy
  • Prospective Studies
  • Random Allocation
  • Suction*
  • Tonsillectomy