Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 6:13:984211.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.984211. eCollection 2022.

Learning English vocabulary from word cards: A research synthesis

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Learning English vocabulary from word cards: A research synthesis

Yuanying Lei et al. Front Psychol. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Researchers' interest in the learning of vocabulary from word cards has grown alongside the increasing number of studies published on this topic. While meta-analyses or systematic reviews have been previously performed, the types of word cards investigated, and the number of word card studies analyzed were limited. To address these issues, a research synthesis was conducted to provide an inclusive and comprehensive picture of how the use of word cards by learners results in vocabulary learning. A search of the Web of Science and Scopus databases resulted in 803 potential studies, of which 32 aligned with the inclusion criteria. Coding of these studies based on an extensive coding scheme found most studies assessed receptive vocabulary knowledge more often than productive vocabulary knowledge, and knowledge of vocabulary form and meaning were assessed more often than knowledge of vocabulary use. Results of effect size plots showed that more of the reviewed studies showed larger effects for the use of paper word cards than digital word cards, and for the use of ready-made word cards than self-constructed word cards. Results also indicated more studies showed larger effects for using word cards in an intentional learning condition compared with an incidental learning condition, and for using word cards in a massed learning condition compared with a spaced learning condition. Although a correlation was found between time spent using word cards and vocabulary learning outcomes, this correlation was not statistically significant. Learners that were more proficient in English learned more words from using word cards than those less proficient. These results suggest that future researchers should report learner proficiency, adopt reliable tests to assess vocabulary learning outcomes, compare the effectiveness of ready-made word cards and self-constructed word cards, and investigate the learning of different aspects of word knowledge. Teachers should provide learners guidance in how to use word cards and target word selection for self-construction of word cards. In addition, teachers should encourage learners to create word cards for incidentally encountered unknown words and use massed learning when initially working with these new words before using spaced learning for later retrieval practice.

Keywords: flashcards; productive knowledge; receptive knowledge; vocabulary; word cards.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Frequency of year of publication.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Frequency of word knowledge type (k = 29). Max = 29 as only 29 of the 32 studies provided necessary data. RF, receptive knowledge of form; PF, productive knowledge of form; RM, receptive knowledge of meaning; PM, productive knowledge of meaning; RU, receptive knowledge of use; PU, productive knowledge of use. As more than one aspect of word knowledge might have been assessed within a single study, the total is higher than 29.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect size plot for type of word cards (k = 32).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effect size plot for learning conditions (k = 32).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Effect size plot for proficiency level of learners (k = 17).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. *. Alhuwaydi A. A. (2020). Effect of smartphone flashcard app on Saudi undergraduates' vocabulary acquisition in EFL reading classes. Asian EFL J. 27, 227–250.
    1. *. Aminafshar N. (2017). EFL language learners' perception for learning vocabulary by using CAP and flash cards. Modern J. Lang. Teach. Methods 7, 86–94.
    1. *. Azabdaftari B., Mozaheb M. A. (2012). Comparing vocabulary learning of EFL learners by using two different strategies: mobile learning vs. flashcards. Eurocall Rev. 20, 47–59. 10.4995/eurocall.2012.11377 - DOI
    1. *. Barkat B., Aminafshar N. (2015). Effect of call-based and flash card-based techniques of teaching on the target language vocabulary learning. Modern J. Lang. Teach. Methods 5, 49–54.
    1. *. Başoglu E. B., Akdemir Ö. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students' English vocabulary learning: using mobile phones and flash cards. TOJET Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol. 9, 1–7.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources