Aims: Coronary angiography in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) is technically more difficult with increased procedure time, radiation exposure and in-hospital complications. In a contemporary national registry of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing an invasive strategy, we compared the management and outcomes of patients with and without prior CABG.
Methods: The All New Zealand ACS Quality Improvement (ANZACS-QI) registry was used to identify patients admitted to New Zealand public hospitals with an ACS who underwent invasive coronary angiography (2014-2018). Outcomes were ascertained by anonymised linkage to national datasets.
Results: Of 26,869 patients, 1,791 (6.7%) had prior CABG and 25,078 (93.3%) had no prior CABG. Prior CABG patients were older (mean age 71 years vs 65 years), more comorbid and less likely to be revascularised than those without CABG (49.8% vs 73.0%). Compared to patients without CABG, at a mean follow-up of 2.1 years, patients with prior CABG had higher all-cause mortality (HR 2.03 (1.80-2.29)), and were more likely to have recurrent myocardial infarction (HR 2.70 (2.40-3.04)), rehospitalisation with congestive cardiac failure (HR 2.36 (2.10-2.66)) and stroke (HR 1.82 (1.41-2.34)).
Conclusion: In contemporary real-world practice, despite half of the patients with ACS and prior CABG receiving PCI, the outcomes remain poor compared with those without prior CABG.
© PMA.