Continuity of mental health care during the transition from prison to the community following brief periods of imprisonment

Christie C Browne; Daria Korobanova; Prabin Chemjong; Anthony W F Harris; Nick Glozier; John Basson; Sarah-Jane Spencer; Kimberlie Dean

doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.934837

Continuity of mental health care during the transition from prison to the community following brief periods of imprisonment

Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 20:13:934837. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.934837. eCollection 2022.

Authors

Christie C Browne^{1

2}, Daria Korobanova^{1

2

3}, Prabin Chemjong^{2

3}, Anthony W F Harris^{3

4}, Nick Glozier^{4

5

6}, John Basson^{1

3}, Sarah-Jane Spencer^{1

2}, Kimberlie Dean^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
² Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
³ Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
⁴ Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
⁵ Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
⁶ Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Children and Families Over the Life Course, Indooroopilly, QLD, Australia.

Abstract

Purpose: The prison-to-community transition period is one of high risk and need, particularly for those with mental illness. Some individuals cycle in and out of prison for short periods with little opportunity for mental health stabilization or service planning either in prison or the community. This study describes the socio-demographic, clinical and criminal justice characteristics of individuals with mental illness and frequent, brief periods of imprisonment, examines continuity of mental health care between prison and the community for this group, and reports on their post-release mental health and criminal justice outcomes.

Design/methodology/approach: This study examined a sample of 275 men who had recently entered prison in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, who had been charged with relatively minor offenses and had been identified on reception screening as having significant mental health needs. Baseline demographic and mental health information was collected via interview and file review and contacts with the prison mental health service were recorded for the period of incarceration. Follow-up interviews were conducted 3 months post-release to determine level of health service contact and mental health symptoms. Information on criminal justice contact during the 3 month period was also collected.

Findings: The majority (85.5%) of the sample had contact with a mental health professional during their period of incarceration. Mental health discharge planning was, however, lacking, with only one in 20 receiving a referral to a community mental health team (CMHT) and one in eight being referred for any kind of mental health follow-up on release. Of those followed up 3 months post-release (n = 113), 14.2% had had contact with a CMHT. Of those released for at least 3 months (n = 255), one in three had received new charges in this period and one in five had been reincarcerated.

Conclusion: Continuity of mental health care for those exiting prison is poor, particularly for those with mental health needs experiencing brief periods of imprisonment, and rates of CMHT contact are low in the immediate post-release period. These findings suggest a need for early identification of individuals in this group for timely commencement of intervention and release planning, and opportunities for diversion from prison should be utilized where possible.

Keywords: community; mental health; prison; release; reoffending; transition.