A single-center comparison of our initial experiences in treating penile and urethral cancer with video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) and later experiences in melanoma cases

A Gómez-Ferrer; A Collado; M Ramírez; J Domínguez; J Casanova; C Mir; A Wong; J L Marenco; E Nagore; V Soriano; J Rubio-Briones

doi:10.3389/fsurg.2022.870857

A single-center comparison of our initial experiences in treating penile and urethral cancer with video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) and later experiences in melanoma cases

Front Surg. 2022 Sep 26:9:870857. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.870857. eCollection 2022.

Authors

A Gómez-Ferrer¹, A Collado¹, M Ramírez¹, J Domínguez¹, J Casanova¹, C Mir¹, A Wong¹, J L Marenco¹, E Nagore², V Soriano³, J Rubio-Briones¹

Affiliations

¹ Urology Department, Valencian Institute of Oncology Foundation, Valencia, Spain.
² Dermatology Department, Valencian Institute of Oncology Foundation, Valencia, Spain.
³ Medical Oncology Department, Valencian Institute of Oncology Foundation, Valencia, Spain.

Abstract

Background: Video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) is a minimally invasive approach that is increasingly indicated in oncological settings, with mounting evidence for its long-term oncological safety.

Objectives: To present our single-center experience of treating penile and urethral cancer with VEIL, as well as its more recent application in melanoma patients.

Methods: We prospectively recorded our experiences with VEIL from September 2010 to July 2018, registering the patient primary indication, surgical details, complications, and follow-up.

Results: Twenty-nine patients were operated in one (24) or both (5) groins; 18 had penile cancer, 1 had urethral cancer, and 10 had melanoma. A mean 8.62 ± 4.45 lymph nodes were removed using VEIL and of these, an average of 1.00 ± 2.87 were metastatic; 16 patients developed lymphocele and 10 presented some degree of lymphedema; there were no skin or other major complications. The median follow-up was 19.35 months; there were 3 penile cancer patient recurrences in the VEIL-operated side. None of the melanoma patients presented a lymphatic inguinal recurrence.

Conclusions: VEIL is a minimally invasive technique which appears to be oncologically safe showing fewer complications than open surgery. However, complications such as lymphorrhea, lymphocele, or lymphedema were not diminished by using VEIL.

Keywords: endoscopy; lymph node excision; melanoma; penile neoplasms; urethral neoplasms.