Worse outcomes with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in severe pelvic fracture: A matched cohort study

Am J Surg. 2023 Feb;225(2):414-419. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.09.057. Epub 2022 Oct 10.

Abstract

Background: Severe pelvic fracture is the most common indication for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). This matched cohort study investigated outcomes with or without REBOA use in isolated severe pelvic fractures.

Methods: Trauma Quality Improvement Program database study, included patients with isolated severe pelvic fracture (AIS≥3), excluded associated injuries with AIS >3 for any region other than lower extremity. REBOA patients were propensity score matched to similar patients without REBOA. Outcomes were mortality and complications.

Results: 93 REBOA patients were matched with 279 without. REBOA patients had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (32.3% vs 19%, p = 0.008), higher rates of venous thromboembolism (14% vs 6.5%, p = 0.023) and DVT (11.8% vs 5.4%, p = 0.035). In multivariate analysis, REBOA use was independently associated with increased mortality and venous thromboembolism.

Conclusions: REBOA in severe pelvic fractures is associated with higher rates of mortality, venous thromboembolism.

Keywords: Pelvic fractures; REBOA; Worse outcomes.

MeSH terms

  • Aorta
  • Balloon Occlusion*
  • Cohort Studies
  • Endovascular Procedures*
  • Fractures, Bone* / complications
  • Fractures, Bone* / therapy
  • Humans
  • Injury Severity Score
  • Resuscitation / adverse effects
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Shock, Hemorrhagic* / etiology
  • Shock, Hemorrhagic* / therapy
  • Venous Thromboembolism* / etiology