Prevalence, trend, and predictor analyses of vitamin D deficiency in the US population, 2001-2018

Aiyong Cui; Peilun Xiao; Yuzhuo Ma; Zhiqiang Fan; Fengjin Zhou; Jiang Zheng; Liang Zhang

doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.965376

Prevalence, trend, and predictor analyses of vitamin D deficiency in the US population, 2001-2018

Front Nutr. 2022 Oct 3:9:965376. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.965376. eCollection 2022.

Authors

Aiyong Cui¹, Peilun Xiao², Yuzhuo Ma¹, Zhiqiang Fan³, Fengjin Zhou³, Jiang Zheng⁴, Liang Zhang⁴

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopedics, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
² Department of Orthopaedics, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China.
³ Department of Pelvic and Acetabular Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
⁴ Department of Sports Medicine, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Abstract

Background: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) collect and release data to the public every 2 years. The latest NHANES study on the vitamin D status of Americans was based on data from 2001 to 2014, and the latest data (2015-2016 and 2017-2018) have not been studied yet. Thus, we extracted all the available data from NHANES (2001-2018), aiming to analyze the prevalence and trends of vitamin D deficiency (VDD) in the US population to bridge the research gap.

Methods: According to previous studies and nutritional guidelines for vitamin D, severe VDD was defined as serum 25(OH)D levels of <25 nmol/L, moderate deficiency as 25-50 nmol/L, insufficiency as 50-75 nmol/L, and sufficiency as >75 nmol/L. We comprehensively estimated the prevalence of serum 25(OH)D levels of <25, 25-50, 50-75, and >75 nmol/L in Americans and described trends in vitamin D status from 2001 to 2018. Weighted multivariate linear regression models were used to explore the predictors of VDD. All analyses and the data were adjusted for the complex sampling design of NHANES using Mobile Examination Center (MEC) weights.

Results: Based on the most recent data of 71,685 participants, our study showed that the weighted prevalence of severe and moderate VDD was 2.6% and 22.0%, and the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency (VDI) and sufficiency was 40.9% and 34.5%. The prevalence of severe and moderate VDD was higher in women, non-Hispanic black Americans, people aged 20-29 years, and during the season of winter. From 2001 to 2018, we found a slight linear decrease in the prevalence of moderate VDD (coefficient = -0.847; P = 0.009) and VDI (coefficient = -0.810; P = 0.014). We also found a slight linear increase in vitamin D sufficient (coefficient = 1.693; P = 0.004). However, no trend change was observed in severe VDD (coefficient = -0.037; P = 0.698). Age, sex, ethnicity, season, sun-protective behaviors, lower BMI, lower socioeconomic status (SES), drinking, and lower milk consumption were predictors of severe VDD.

Conclusion: Vitamin D deficiency is still prevalent in the United States, especially in non-Hispanic black Americans, women, individuals aged 20-29, and during winter. Therefore, individuals, healthcare providers, and policymakers should take public health measures to develop and implement prevention strategies to deal with VDD.

Keywords: NHANES; predictors; prevalence; trends; vitamin D.