Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 1;8(12):1747-1755.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.4319.

Association of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Rates With Subsequent Metastatic Prostate Cancer Incidence at US Veterans Health Administration Facilities

Affiliations

Association of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Rates With Subsequent Metastatic Prostate Cancer Incidence at US Veterans Health Administration Facilities

Alex K Bryant et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: There is controversy about the benefit of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. Prostate-specific antigen screening rates have decreased since 2008 in the US, and the incidence of metastatic prostate cancer has increased. However, there is no direct epidemiologic evidence of a correlation between population PSA screening rates and subsequent metastatic prostate cancer rates.

Objective: To assess whether facility-level variation in PSA screening rates is associated with subsequent facility-level metastatic prostate cancer incidence.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort used data for all men aged 40 years or older with an encounter at 128 facilities in the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2019.

Exposures: Yearly facility-level PSA screening rates, defined as the proportion of men aged 40 years or older with a PSA test in each year, and long-term nonscreening rates, defined as the proportion of men aged 40 years or older without a PSA test in the prior 3 years, from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2014.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcomes were facility-level yearly counts of incident metastatic prostate cancer diagnoses and age-adjusted yearly metastatic prostate cancer incidence rates (per 100 000 men) 5 years after each PSA screening exposure year.

Results: The cohort included 4 678 412 men in 2005 and 5 371 701 men in 2019. Prostate-specific antigen screening rates decreased from 47.2% in 2005 to 37.0% in 2019, and metastatic prostate cancer incidence increased from 5.2 per 100 000 men in 2005 to 7.9 per 100 000 men in 2019. Higher facility-level PSA screening rates were associated with lower metastatic prostate cancer incidence 5 years later (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.91 per 10% increase in PSA screening rate; 95% CI, 0.87-0.96; P < .001). Higher long-term nonscreening rates were associated with higher metastatic prostate cancer incidence 5 years later (IRR, 1.11 per 10% increase in long-term nonscreening rate; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19; P = .01).

Conclusions and relevance: From 2005 to 2019, PSA screening rates decreased in the national VHA system. Facilities with higher PSA screening rates had lower subsequent rates of metastatic prostate cancer. These data may be used to inform shared decision-making about the potential benefits of PSA screening among men who wish to reduce their risk of metastatic prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Murphy reported receiving personal fees from Boston Consulting Group outside the submitted work. Dr Natajaran reported receiving grants from the US Department of Defense during the conduct of the study. Dr DuVall reported receiving grants from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Astellas Pharma, Inc, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Biodesix, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly and Company, Genentech Inc, Gilead Sciences Inc, GlaxoSmithKline PLC, Innocrin Pharmaceuticals Inc, IQVIA Inc, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Kantar Health, MDxHealth, Merck & Co, Inc, Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc, Novartis International AG, and Parexel International Corporation outside the submitted work. Dr Lynch reported receiving grants from the Department of Veterans Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure during the conduct of the study and receiving grants from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Astellas Pharma, Inc, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Biodesix, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly and Company, Genentech Inc, Gilead Sciences Inc, GlaxoSmithKline PLC, Innocrin Pharmaceuticals Inc, IQVIA Inc, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Kantar Health, MDxHealth, Merck & Co, Inc, Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc, Novartis International AG, and Parexel International Corporation through the University of Utah or Western Institute for Veteran Research outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Screening, Prostate Biopsy, and Prostate Cancer Incidence Rates by Age Group
Long-term nonscreening rates represent the proportion of patients without a PSA screening test in the prior 3 years. All rates were pooled across 128 Veterans Health Administration facilities. Vertical dashed line represents the year of US Preventive Services Task Force screening guideline publication in 2012.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Screening, Prostate Biopsy, and Prostate Cancer Incidence Rates by Racial and Ethnic Group
Long-term nonscreening rates represent the proportion of patients without a PSA screening test in the prior 3 years. All rates were pooled across 128 Veterans Health Administration facilities. “Other” included Asian and Hispanic men. Vertical dashed line represents the year of US Preventive Services Task Force screening guideline publication in 2012.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Association of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Rates and Long-term Nonscreening Rates With Subsequent Metastatic Prostate Cancer Incidence
Predicted case count estimates were generated from multivariable mixed-effects negative binomial models using a random effect of 0, continuous covariates at their mean values, Pacific region, and facility size of 40 889 men. Shaded areas indicate 95% CIs.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Potosky AL, Miller BA, Albertsen PC, Kramer BS. The role of increasing detection in the rising incidence of prostate cancer. JAMA. 1995;273(7):548-552. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520310046028 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Carlsson S, et al. . Screening for prostate cancer decreases the risk of developing metastatic disease: findings from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Eur Urol. 2012;62(5):745-752. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.068 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. ; ERSPC Investigators . Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up. Lancet. 2014;384(9959):2027-2035. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60525-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL III, et al. ; PLCO Project Team . Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1310-1319. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0810696 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL III, et al. ; PLCO Project Team . Prostate cancer screening in the randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: mortality results after 13 years of follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(2):125-132. doi:10.1093/jnci/djr500 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances