[Efficacy analysis of lidocaine plaster combined with gabapentin in the treatment of herpes zoster neuralgia]

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lidocaine plaster combined with gabapentin in the treatment of herpes zoster neuralgia (HZN). Methods: A total of 93 patients diagnosed with HZN from June 4, 2021 to January 5, 2022 in the Department of Pain Clinic of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital were selected, and their gender was not limited. They were divided into 3 groups by random number table method: group A (n=32) prescribed gabapentin alone, group B (n=30) lidocaine plaster alone, and group C (n=31) lidocaine plaster combined with gabapentin. After excluding patients who did not meet the criteria, there were 28 cases in group A, 28 cases in group B, and 29 cases in group C. The visual analogue scale (VAS), the short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) score, and drug dosage and adverse reaction in each group at pre-treatment (T0), post-treatment in one week (T1), in two weeks (T2), in four weeks (T4), and in 12 weeks (T12) were recorded and evaluated; Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score and Medical Outcomes Study short-form 36 (SF-36) score at T0, T4, and T12 were recorded. Adverse reactions and drug dosage in each group were documented. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare the curative effects of the three groups at different time points before and after treatment. Results: The ages of the three groups of patients were (67.8±10.0), (60.9±11.4) and (63.5±12.5) years old respectively (P=0.318), and the proportions of men were 46.4 % (13 cases), 35.7% (10 cases) and 44.8 % (13 cases), respectively (P=0.472). After treatment, the VAS scores and SF-MPQ scores of patients in the three groups were decreased at each time point compared with those before treatment (all P<0.05), the VAS and SF-MPQ scores of patients in group C at T12 time point were 1.2±0.4 and 5.2±2.4 respectively, which were lower than those of patients in groups A and B (both P<0.05). The dosages of gabapentin and lidocaine plaster in group C were lower than those in groups A and B at each time point after treatment (all P<0.05). The PSQI scores of patients in the three groups at T4 and T12 were lower than those before treatment (all P<0.05). The PSQI scores of patients in group C at T4 and T12 were 5.7±1.2 and 4.5±1.2, which were lower than those of patients in groups A and B. (all P<0.05), The SF-36 scores of patients in three groups at T4 and T12 were higher than those before treatment (all P<0.05), and the SF-36 scores of group C at T4 and T12 were 91.7±8.5, 93.1±6.3, which were higher than that of patients in groups A and B (both P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the three groups were 35.7% (9 cases), 10.7% (3 cases), and 13.8% (4 cases) respectively (P<0.05), the adverse reactions in groups B and C were less than those in group A (P<0.05), and there was no statistical difference between groups B and C (P>0.05). Conclusion: Lidocaine plaster combined with gabapentin has better analgesic effect in the treatment of HZN, with less incidence of adverse reactions, and can reduce the dosage of systemic drugs, improve patients' sleep and quality of life, and thus could provide a safe and effective method for the treatment of HZN.