Cost-effectiveness of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Denmark compared with PPV23

J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):1240-1254. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2152235.

Abstract

Background: A new 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) provides protection against 20 pneumococcal serotypes. The vaccine has the potential to decrease the impact of pneumococcal diseases in society and to increase health among vulnerable persons.

Aim: This study investigates the cost-effectiveness of vaccinating Danish adults in different age groups and risk of pneumococcal disease with PCV20 compared to the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) - either as PCV20 compared to PPV23 or as PPV23 followed by PCV20 compared to PPV23.

Methods: A Markov model adapted to the Danish setting was developed to estimate clinical outcomes and costs of vaccinating the Danish population in specific age and risk groups. The model used a restricted societal perspective and estimated outcomes and costs using a lifetime time horizon. To estimate the clinical outcomes and costs, inputs on vaccine effectiveness and waning were retrieved from other studies whereas data on risk groups, coverage and costs were based on real-world data.

Results: The results showed that in all scenarios the incidence and mortality of pneumococcal disease were reduced when vaccinating with PCV20, resulting in lower costs. For the vaccine target group of adults aged ≥18 years at moderate or high risk and all adults aged ≥65 years both in the case of PPV23+PCV20 compared to PPV23 and in case of PCV20 compared to PPV23 vaccination with PCV20 was found to be a dominant strategy gaining 1,350 or 5,821 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), respectively, and reducing total costs by 60 or 396 million EUR, respectively, as compared to PPV23 vaccination alone. Similar results of dominant PCV20 strategy were found for other age and risk group comparisons. Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the results being robust to changes in input parameters and applied assumptions.

Limitations: Like other modelling studies, this analysis has limitations such as lack of detailed data for some inputs.

Conclusion: Vaccination with PCV20 reduced the incidence and mortality of pneumococcal diseases in Danish adults compared to PPV23. This reduction has the potential to reduce the financial burden related to managing diseases while also increasing public health.

Keywords: 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; I; I1; I10; I18; PCV20; Pneumonia; Streptococcus pneumonia; cost-effectiveness; cost-utility analysis; pneumococcal infections; vaccination; vaccine.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Denmark / epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Pneumococcal Infections* / prevention & control
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Vaccines, Conjugate / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Vaccines, Conjugate