Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 1;9(2):206-214.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5623.

Medical Marijuana Legalization and Opioid- and Pain-Related Outcomes Among Patients Newly Diagnosed With Cancer Receiving Anticancer Treatment

Affiliations

Medical Marijuana Legalization and Opioid- and Pain-Related Outcomes Among Patients Newly Diagnosed With Cancer Receiving Anticancer Treatment

Yuhua Bao et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: The past decade saw rapid declines in opioids dispensed to patients with active cancer, with a concurrent increase in marijuana use among cancer survivors possibly associated with state medical marijuana legalization.

Objective: To assess the associations between medical marijuana legalization and opioid-related and pain-related outcomes for adult patients receiving cancer treatment.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study used 2012 to 2017 national commercial claims data and a difference-in-differences design to estimate the associations of interest for patients residing in 34 states without medical marijuana legalization by January 1, 2012. Secondary analysis differentiated between medical marijuana legalization with and without legal allowances for retail dispensaries. Data analysis was conducted between December 2021 and August 2022. Study samples included privately insured patients aged 18 to 64 years who received anticancer treatment during the 6 months after a new breast (in women), colorectal, or lung cancer diagnosis.

Exposures: State medical marijuana legalization that took effect between 2012 and 2017.

Main outcomes and measures: Having 1 or more days of opioids, 1 or more days of long-acting opioids, total morphine milligram equivalents of any opioid dispensed to patients with 1 or more opioid days, and 1 or more pain-related emergency department visits or hospitalizations (hereafter, hospital events) during the 6 months after a new cancer diagnosis. Interaction terms were included between each policy indicator and an indicator of recent opioids, defined as having 1 or more opioid prescriptions during the 12 months before the new cancer diagnosis. Logistic models were estimated for dichotomous outcomes, and generalized linear models were estimated for morphine milligram equivalents.

Results: The analysis included 38 189 patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer (38 189 women [100%]), 12 816 with colorectal cancer (7100 men [55.4%]), and 7190 with lung cancer (3674 women [51.1%]). Medical marijuana legalization was associated with a reduction in the rate of 1 or more opioid days from 90.1% to 84.4% (difference, 5.6 [95% CI, 2.2-9.0] percentage points; P = .001) among patients with breast cancer with recent opioids, from 89.4% to 84.4% (difference, 4.9 [95% CI, 0.5-9.4] percentage points; P = .03) among patients with colorectal cancer with recent opioids, and from 33.8% to 27.2% (difference, 6.5 [95% CI, 1.2-11.9] percentage points; P = .02) among patients with lung cancer without recent opioids. Medical marijuana legalization was associated with a reduction in the rate of 1 or more pain-related hospital events from 19.3% to 13.0% (difference, 6.3 [95% CI, 0.7-12.0] percentage points; P = .03) among patients with lung cancer with recent opioids.

Conclusions and relevance: Findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that medical marijuana legalization implemented from 2012 to 2017 was associated with a lower rate of opioid dispensing and pain-related hospital events among some adults receiving treatment for newly diagnosed cancer. The nature of these associations and their implications for patient safety and quality of life need to be further investigated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Bao reported receiving grants from Arnold Ventures and the National Institute on Drug Abuse during the conduct of the study. Dr Rosa reported receiving grants from the Cambia Health Foundation and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, consulting fees from Sunstone Therapies, and royalties from Springer Publishing outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Estimated Rate of 1 or More Opioid Days During the 6 Months After a New Cancer Diagnosis Conditional on Exposure to MML
Recent opioids is defined as having 1 or more opioid prescriptions during the 12 months before the month of the new cancer diagnosis. MML indicates medical marijuana legalization. Whiskers represent 95% CIs of estimated rates.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Estimated Rate of 1 or More Pain-Related ED Visits or Hospitalizations During the 6 Months After a New Cancer Diagnosis Conditional on Exposure to MML
Recent opioids is defined as having 1 or more opioid prescriptions during the 12 months before the month of the new cancer diagnosis. MML indicates medical marijuana legalization. Whiskers represent 95% CIs of estimated rates.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Estimated Rate of 1 or More Opioid Days During the 6 Months After a New Cancer Diagnosis, Secondary Analysis Differentiating Between MML With and Without Legal Allowances for Retail Dispensaries
Recent opioids is defined as having 1 or more opioid prescriptions during the 12 months before the month of the new cancer diagnosis. MML indicates medical marijuana legalization. Whiskers represent 95% CIs of estimated rates.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. van den Beuken-van Everdingen MHJ, Hochstenbach LMJ, Joosten EAJ, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Janssen DJA. Update on prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016;51(6):1070-1090.e9. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.340 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Swarm RA, Paice JA, Anghelescu DL, et al. . Adult cancer pain, version 3.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17(8):977-1007. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0038 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fallon M, Giusti R, Aielli F, et al. ; ESMO Guidelines Committee . Management of cancer pain in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(suppl 4):iv166-iv191. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy152 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caraceni A, Hanks G, Kaasa S, et al. ; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC); European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) . Use of opioid analgesics in the treatment of cancer pain: evidence-based recommendations from the EAPC. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(2):e58-e68. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70040-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roberto A, Greco MT, Uggeri S, et al. . Living systematic review to assess the analgesic undertreatment in cancer patients. Pain Pract. 2022;22(4):487-496. doi:10.1111/papr.13098 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types