Readability, Content, and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials on Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity in the Pediatric Population
- PMID: 36470295
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1754408
Readability, Content, and Quality of Online Patient Education Materials on Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity in the Pediatric Population
Abstract
Objective: Internet-based patient education materials (PEMs) are often above the recommended sixth grade reading level recommended by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. In 2016 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a warning statement against use of general anesthetic drugs in children and pregnant women due to concerns about neurotoxicity. The aim of this study is to evaluate readability, content, and quality of Internet-based PEMs on anesthesia in the pediatric population and neurotoxicity.
Study design: The websites of U.S. medical centers with pediatric anesthesiology fellowship programs were searched for PEMs pertaining to pediatric anesthesia and neurotoxicity. Readability was assessed. PEM content was evaluated using matrices specific to pediatric anesthesia and neurotoxicity. PEM quality was assessed with the Patient Education Material Assessment Tool for Print. A one-sample t-test was used to compare the readability of the PEMs to the recommended sixth grade reading level.
Results: We identified 27 PEMs pertaining to pediatric anesthesia and eight to neurotoxicity. Mean readability of all PEMs was greater than a sixth grade reading (p <0.001). While only 13% of PEMs on anesthesia for pediatric patient mentioned the FDA warning, 100% of the neurotoxicity materials did. PEMs had good understandability (83%) and poor actionability (60%).
Conclusion: The readability, content, and quality of PEMs are poor and should be improved to help parents and guardians make informed decisions about their children's health care.
Key points: · The FDA issued a warning statement against the use of general anesthetic drugs in children and pregnant women.. · Readability, content, and quality of Internet-based patient education materials on the topic of neurotoxicity are poor.. · Improving the readability, content, and quality of PEMs could aid parents in making important health care decisions..
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
P.T., MD, MPH was supported by grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R03MD011628, R03HS025267, and R18HS026169). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) or the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities.
Similar articles
-
Readability, content, and quality of COVID-19 patient education materials from academic medical centers in the United States.Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jun;49(6):690-693. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.023. Epub 2020 Nov 28. Am J Infect Control. 2021. PMID: 33259825 Free PMC article.
-
Readability, content, quality and accuracy assessment of internet-based patient education materials relating to labor analgesia.Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 Aug;39:82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 8. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019. PMID: 31000314
-
Readability, Content, and Quality Assessment of Web-Based Patient Education Materials Addressing Neuraxial Labor Analgesia.Anesth Analg. 2015 Nov;121(5):1295-300. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000888. Anesth Analg. 2015. PMID: 26252170
-
Review of the quality of printed patient education materials on asthma available in primary care in Singapore.J Asthma. 2020 Jul;57(7):787-798. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1602876. Epub 2019 May 6. J Asthma. 2020. PMID: 31056964 Review.
-
Quality, Readability, and Suitability of Hearing Health-Related Materials: A Descriptive Review.Am J Audiol. 2020 Sep 3;29(3):513-527. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-19-00040. Epub 2020 Jun 18. Am J Audiol. 2020. PMID: 32551926 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
