Objective: Wound complications are a prevalent concern for neuromodulation procedures. While removal of the device was recommended, attempts to salvage expensive hardware have become commonplace. We examine our management in wound issues to aid in providing guidance for these situations.
Methods: We identified 40 patients over an 8-year period in a large neuromodulation practice, who underwent washout or partial salvage of hardware. We examined the efficacy of washout and partial explants on the ability to salvage the implants. Covariates including age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, anticoagulation, and device type were considered.
Results: There were 29 washouts and 10 partial hardware removal cases. Washouts were successful in 15/29 cases (51.7%), partial hardware removal was successful in 2/10 cases (20%), and removal with replacement was not successful (0 of 1). Washouts tended to be more successful than partial removal procedures (P = 0.08). In cases of successful washout, the average duration between infectious symptoms and washout was 7.27 ± 2.19 days. None of the demographic variables were associated with increased likelihood of washout failure.
Conclusions: Our results demonstrate a higher rate of washout failure in those who underwent partial device removal and in the presence of purulence at the surgical site. Further investigation must be conducted to determine the instances in which hardware removal is indicated to prevent failure or removal due to infection. Identification of these parameters will optimize therapeutic benefit and long-term financial impact.
Keywords: Deep brain stimulation; Erosion; Infection; Intrathecal pump; Neuromodulation; Salvage; Spinal cord stimulation; Washout.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.