Effect of a Biopsychosocial Intervention or Postural Therapy on Disability and Health Care Spending Among Patients With Acute and Subacute Spine Pain: The SPINE CARE Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 36538309
- PMCID: PMC9856689
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.22625
Effect of a Biopsychosocial Intervention or Postural Therapy on Disability and Health Care Spending Among Patients With Acute and Subacute Spine Pain: The SPINE CARE Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Importance: Low back and neck pain are often self-limited, but health care spending remains high.
Objective: To evaluate the effects of 2 interventions that emphasize noninvasive care for spine pain.
Design, setting, and participants: Pragmatic, cluster, randomized clinical trial conducted at 33 centers in the US that enrolled 2971 participants with neck or back pain of 3 months' duration or less (enrollment, June 2017 to March 2020; final follow-up, March 2021).
Interventions: Participants were randomized at the clinic-level to (1) usual care (n = 992); (2) a risk-stratified, multidisciplinary intervention (the identify, coordinate, and enhance [ICE] care model that combines physical therapy, health coach counseling, and consultation from a specialist in pain medicine or rehabilitation) (n = 829); or (3) individualized postural therapy (IPT), a postural therapy approach that combines physical therapy with building self-efficacy and self-management (n = 1150).
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes were change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 3 months (range, 0 [best] to 100 [worst]; minimal clinically important difference, 6) and spine-related health care spending at 1 year. A 2-sided significance threshold of .025 was used to define statistical significance.
Results: Among 2971 participants randomized (mean age, 51.7 years; 1792 women [60.3%]), 2733 (92%) finished the trial. Between baseline and 3-month follow-up, mean ODI scores changed from 31.2 to 15.4 for ICE, from 29.3 to 15.4 for IPT, and from 28.9 to 19.5 for usual care. At 3-month follow-up, absolute differences compared with usual care were -5.8 (95% CI, -7.7 to -3.9; P < .001) for ICE and -4.3 (95% CI, -5.9 to -2.6; P < .001) for IPT. Mean 12-month spending was $1448, $2528, and $1587 in the ICE, IPT, and usual care groups, respectively. Differences in spending compared with usual care were -$139 (risk ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.87 to 0.997]; P = .04) for ICE and $941 (risk ratio, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.35 to 1.45]; P < .001) for IPT.
Conclusions and relevance: Among patients with acute or subacute spine pain, a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial intervention or an individualized postural therapy intervention, each compared with usual care, resulted in small but statistically significant reductions in pain-related disability at 3 months. However, compared with usual care, the biopsychosocial intervention resulted in no significant difference in spine-related health care spending and the postural therapy intervention resulted in significantly greater spine-related health care spending at 1 year.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03083886.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
Conservative Therapy for Acute and Subacute Back or Neck Pain.JAMA. 2022 Dec 20;328(23):2307-2309. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.21833. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 36538324 No abstract available.
-
Biopsychosocial Intervention or Postural Therapy in Patients With Spine Pain.JAMA. 2023 Apr 25;329(16):1408. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.3059. JAMA. 2023. PMID: 37097359 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Design of the Spine Pain Intervention to Enhance Care Quality And Reduce Expenditure Trial (SPINE CARE) study: Methods and lessons from a multi-site pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial.Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Dec;111:106602. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106602. Epub 2021 Oct 22. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021. PMID: 34688915 Clinical Trial.
-
Early Physical Therapy vs Usual Care in Patients With Recent-Onset Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2015 Oct 13;314(14):1459-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.11648. JAMA. 2015. PMID: 26461996 Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of App-Delivered, Tailored Self-management Support for Adults With Lower Back Pain-Related Disability: A selfBACK Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Oct 1;181(10):1288-1296. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.4097. JAMA Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 34338710 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparing Ways to Treat Low Back Pain and Prevent Chronic Pain and Disability—The TARGET Trial [Internet].Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2021 May. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2021 May. PMID: 38377265 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Stratified primary care for adults with musculoskeletal pain: the STarT MSK research programme including RCTs.Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2023 Jun. Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2023 Jun. PMID: 37490570 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluating the STarTBack stratified treatment approach for low back pain: exploring study-level factors potentially explaining differences in results of studies - a literature review.BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 25;14(6):e081704. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081704. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38925707 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of a classification-based approach to low back pain in primary care - a benchmarking controlled trial.J Rehabil Med. 2024 Apr 20;56:jrm28321. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.28321. J Rehabil Med. 2024. PMID: 38643363 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
