Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 12;10(12):2510.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122510.

The Association between Bundled Payment Participation and Changes in Medical Episode Outcomes among High-Risk Patients

Affiliations

The Association between Bundled Payment Participation and Changes in Medical Episode Outcomes among High-Risk Patients

Joshua M Liao et al. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Bundled payments for medical conditions are associated with stable quality and savings through shorter skilled nursing facility (SNF) length of stay. However, effects among clinically higher-risk patients remain unknown. Objective: To evaluate whether the association between participation in bundled payments for medical conditions and episode outcomes differed for clinically high-risk versus other patients. Design: Retrospective difference-in-differences analysis; Participants: 471,421 Medicare patients hospitalized at bundled payment and propensity-matched non-participating hospitals. Exposures were 5 measures of clinically high-risk groups: advanced age (>85 years old), high case-mix, disabled, frail, and prior institutional post-acute care provider utilization. Main Measures: Primary outcomes were SNF length of stay and 90-day unplanned readmissions. Secondary outcomes included quality, utilization, and spending measures. Key Results: SNF length of stay was differentially lower among frail patients (aDID −0.4 days versus non-frail patients, 95% CI −0.8 to −0.1 days), patients with advanced age (aDID −0.8 days versus younger patients, 95% CI −1.2 to −0.3 days), and those with prior institutional post-acute care provider utilization (aDID −1.1 days versus patients without prior utilization, 95% CI −1.6 to −0.6 days), compared to non-frail, younger, and patients without prior utilization, respectively. BPCI participation was also associated with differentially greater SNF LOS among disabled patients (aDID 0.8 days versus non-disabled patients, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.2 days, p < 0.001). Bundled payment participation was not associated with differential changes in readmissions in any high-risk group but was associated with changes in secondary outcomes for some groups. Conclusions: Changes under medical bundles affected, but did not indiscriminately apply to, high-risk patient groups.

Keywords: health care payment; health policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Liao reports honoraria from Comagine Health, Marcus Evans, and Brown University outside the submitted work. Navathe reports grants from Hawaii Medical Service Association, grants from Commonwealth Fund, grants from Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, grants from Donaghue Foundation, grants from Pennsylvania Department of Health*, grants from the Veterans Affairs Administration*, grants from Ochsner Health System, grants from United Healthcare, grants from Blue Cross Blue Shield of NC, grants from Blue Shield of CA, grants from Humana, personal fees from Navvis Healthcare, personal fees and equity from Navahealth, personal fees from YNHHSC/CORE, personal fees from Maine Health Accountable Care Organization, personal fees from Singapore Ministry of Health, personal fees from Elsevier Press, personal fees from Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, personal fees from Cleveland Clinic, personal fees from Analysis Group, personal fees from VBID Health, personal fees from Advocate Physician Partners, personal fees from the Federal Trade Commission, personal fees from Catholic Health Services Long Island, and equity from Clarify Health, and non-compensated board membership for Integrated Services, Inc. outside the submitted work in the past 3 years.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adjusted Changes in in SNF LOS for Medical Condition Episodes Among High-Risk Patients (2011–2016). Abbreviations: LOS = length of stay; IRF = Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility; SNF = Skilled Nursing Facility. Advanced age = Age > 85 years old. High Case-Mix = Top 20% of Elixhauser score. Prior IRF/SNF Utilization = Utilization within the preceding 12 months.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Adjusted Changes in 90-Day Unplanned Readmission Rate for Medical Condition Episodes Among High-Risk Patients (2011–2016). Abbreviations: IRF = Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility; SNF = Skilled Nursing Facility. At least one acute care readmission during the 90-day episode. Advanced age = Age > 85 years old. High Case-Mix = Top 20% of Elixhauser score. Prior IRF/SNF Utilization = Utilization within the preceding 12 months.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ellis R.P., Chen T., Luscombe C. Comparisons of Health Insurance Systems in Developed Countries. Boston University Department of Economics Working Paper Series. Encycl. Health Econ. 2014;1:1–22.
    1. Struijs J.N., Baan C.A. Integrating Care through Bundled Payments—Lessons from the Netherlands. New Engl. J. Med. 2011;364:990–991. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1011849. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Bakker D.H., Struijs J.N., Baan C.A., Raams J., de Wildt J.-E., Vrijhoef H.J.M., Schut F.T. Early Results From Adoption of Bundled Payment For Diabetes Care In The Netherlands Show Improvement In Care Coordination. Health Aff. 2012;31:426–433. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0912. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pross C., Geissler A., Busse R. Measuring, Reporting, and Rewarding Quality of Care in 5 Nations: 5 Policy Levers to Enhance Hospital Quality Accountability. Milbank Q. 2017;95:136–183. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12248. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Porter M.E., Marks C.M., Landman Z.C. OrthoChoice: Bundled Payments in the County of Stockholm (B) Harv. Bus. Sch. Suppl. 2014:714–515.

LinkOut - more resources