The role of rectal endoscopic ultrasonography plus fine needle aspirartion and fine needle biopsy in pelvic masses

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Feb 1;35(2):153-158. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002468. Epub 2022 Nov 8.

Abstract

Background and aim: The diagnostic role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) and fine needle biopsy (FNB) of pelvic masses has not been well established. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS plus FNA/FNB in suspected local recurrence of pelvic masses.

Materials and methods: All consecutive patients with a history of lower gastrointestinal and pelvic mass undergone EUS-FNA/FNB were included in the study.

Results: In total 34 patients who underwent EUS-guided FNA or FNB of a perirectal mass were enrolled. The sampled lesion was a mass in 22 patients (64.7%) and a lymph node in 10 patients (29.4%). The univariate logistic regression analysis for diagnostic accuracy showed lesion size as a significant predictor of diagnostic accuracy [odds ratio (OR), 1.61; 1.08-2.27; P = 0.02]. Diagnostic sensitivity was 100% (71.5-100%) with EUS-FNB and 75% (34.9-96.8%) with EUS-FNA ( P = 0.12); specificity was 100% in both groups ( P = 1.0). Sample adequacy was 94.1% in the whole cohort, with 20/20 adequacy rate (100%) in the EUS-FNB group and 12/14 (85.7%) in the EUS-FNA group ( P = 0.28).

Conclusion: This is the first study demonstrating the diagnostic yield of EUS plus FNA/FNB in patients with pelvic masses comparing the two needles. Our results highlight the relevance of this technique, especially in undefined masses during oncological follow-up.

MeSH terms

  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration / adverse effects
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration / methods
  • Endosonography*
  • Humans
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms* / pathology