Providers' and Patients' Perspectives on Diagnostic Errors in the Acute Care Setting
- PMID: 36585316
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.11.009
Providers' and Patients' Perspectives on Diagnostic Errors in the Acute Care Setting
Abstract
Background: Diagnostic errors (DEs) have been studied extensively in ambulatory care, but less work has been done in the acute care setting. In this study, the authors examined health care providers' and patients' perspectives about the classification of DEs, the main causes and scope of DEs in acute care, the main gaps in current systems, and the need for innovative solutions.
Methods: A qualitative mixed methods study was conducted, including semistructured interviews with health care providers and focus groups with patient advisors. Using grounded theory approach, thematic categories were derived from the interviews and focus groups.
Results: The research team conducted interviews with 17 providers and two focus groups with seven patient advisors. Both providers and patient advisors struggled to define and describe DEs in acute care settings. Although participants agreed that DEs pose a significant risk to patient safety, their perception of the frequency of DEs was mixed. Most participants identified communication failures, lack of comfort with diagnostic uncertainty, incorrect clinical evaluation, and cognitive load as key causes of DEs. Most respondents believed that non-information technology (IT) tools and processes (for example, communication improvement strategies) could significantly reduce DEs.
Conclusion: The study findings represent an important supplement to our understanding of DEs in acute care settings and the advancement of a culture of patient safety in the context of patient-centered care and patient engagement. Health care organizations should consider the key factors identified in this study when trying to create a culture that engages clinicians and patients in reducing DEs.
Copyright © 2022 The Joint Commission. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Frontline Providers' and Patients' Perspectives on Improving Diagnostic Safety in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study.Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024 Jul;50(7):480-491. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 12. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024. PMID: 38643047 Free PMC article.
-
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447009
-
Evidence Brief: The Quality of Care Provided by Advanced Practice Nurses [Internet].Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2014 Sep. PMID: 27606392 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Primary care providers' perceptions and experiences of family-centered care for older adults: a qualitative study of community-based diabetes management in China.BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jul 23;21(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02380-x. BMC Geriatr. 2021. PMID: 34301190 Free PMC article.
-
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532314 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient-Clinician Diagnostic Concordance upon Hospital Admission.Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Aug;15(4):733-742. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788330. Epub 2024 Sep 18. Appl Clin Inform. 2024. PMID: 39293648
-
Frontline Providers' and Patients' Perspectives on Improving Diagnostic Safety in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study.Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024 Jul;50(7):480-491. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 12. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024. PMID: 38643047 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
