Laparoscopic fundoplication performed in community hospital settings: A protocol for systematic review

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) is well-established as the surgical intervention of choice for management of refactory gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Much of its success lies in the reported benefits in symptom control outlined by the postoperative patient. It is unclear whether patient-reported outcomes differ according to the institution type providing care. This review aimed to address this knowledge gap by reviewing the available evidence examining patient-reported outcomes of LF in non-metropolitan centers.

Objectives: To investigate patient-reported outcomes of LF performed in regional or community-based hospitals.

Data sources: Four electronic databases, and citations of relevant articles.

Study eligibility criteria: Only studies that separately reported patient-reported outcomes of LF performed in regional or community hospitals were included; papers deemed to be unclear about the type of facility in which LF surgeries were performed, or in which data from LF surgeries performed in regional/community hospitals was combined with data from major metropolitan hospitals, were excluded.

Study appraisal: Only studies that were graded as fair or good using Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. Seven studies were then eligible for inclusion, all of which were observational cohort studies with 6 of the studies reporting on a single intervention arm.

Results: Seven observational cohort studies were included in the review, with a combined total of 1071 patients who underwent LF at non-metropolitan centers. Of these, data was collected for 742 patients, yielding an overall response rate of 69.3%. All 7 studies assessed patients' post-operative outcomes through questionnaires that were based on a modified Likert scale or a similar tool. Overall patient satisfaction was high (86%) and a significant majority of patients stated they would recommend the procedure to others (93.3%). Post-operative prevalence of reflux and dysphagia compared favorably to rates generally reported in the literature (11.9% and 17.6% respectively). Further research is required to ascertain the safety of performing these procedures in non-metropolitan hospitals.

Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that patient-reported outcomes are favorable for patients undergoing LF in community settings, and are broadly comparable to those undergoing LF in tertiary-level centers.