Invited Commentary: On the Mathematization of Epidemiology as a Socially Engaged Quantitative Science

Am J Epidemiol. 2023 May 5;192(5):757-759. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad010.

Abstract

Ensuring that patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) have access to optimal medication therapies is a critical challenge in substance use epidemiology. Rudolph et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2023;XXX(X):XXXX-XXXX) demonstrated that sophisticated data-adaptive statistical techniques can be used to learn optimal, individualized treatment rules that can aid providers in choosing a medication treatment modality for a particular patient with OUD. This important work also highlights the effects of the mathematization of epidemiologic research. Here, we define mathematization and demonstrate how it operates in the context of effectiveness research on medications for OUD using the paper by Rudolph et al. as a springboard. In particular, we address the normative dimension of mathematization and how it tends to resolve a fundamental tension in epidemiologic practice between technical sophistication and public health considerations in favor of more technical solutions. The process of mathematization is a fundamental part of epidemiology; we argue not for eliminating it but for balancing mathematization and technical demands equally with practical and community-centric public health needs.

Keywords: epidemiologic methods; mathematization; medication for opioid use disorder; opioid use disorder; treatment rules.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Comment

MeSH terms

  • Analgesics, Opioid
  • Buprenorphine
  • Epidemiologic Studies
  • Humans
  • Opiate Substitution Treatment*
  • Opioid-Related Disorders* / epidemiology
  • Opioid-Related Disorders* / therapy
  • Public Health

Substances

  • Analgesics, Opioid
  • Buprenorphine