Changes to Prenatal Care Visit Frequency and Telehealth: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence
- PMID: 36649343
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005046
Changes to Prenatal Care Visit Frequency and Telehealth: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence
Abstract
Objective: To systematically review patient, partner or family, and clinician perspectives, preferences, and experiences related to prenatal care visit schedules and televisits for routine prenatal care.
Data sources: PubMed, the Cochrane databases, EMBASE, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov , PsycINFO, and SocINDEX from inception through February 12, 2022.
Methods of study selection: This review of qualitative research is a subset of a larger review on both the qualitative experiences and quantitative benefits and harms of reduced prenatal care visit schedules and televisits for routine prenatal care that was produced by the Brown Evidence-based Practice Center for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. For the qualitative review, we included qualitative research studies that examined perspectives, preferences, and experiences about the number of scheduled visits and about televisits for routine prenatal care.
Tabulation, integration, and results: We synthesized barriers and facilitators to the implementation of reduced care visits or of televisits into 1 of 14 domains defined by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and a Best Fit Framework approach. We summarized themes within TDF domains. We assessed our confidence in the summary statements using the GRADE-CERQual (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) tool. Four studies addressed the number of scheduled routine prenatal visits, and five studies addressed televisits. Across studies, health care professionals believed fewer routine visits may be more convenient for patients and may increase clinic capacity to provide additional care for patients with high-risk pregnancies. However, both patients and clinicians had concerns about potential lesser care with fewer visits, including concerns about quality of care and challenges with implementing new delivery-of-care models.
Conclusion: Although health care professionals and patients had some concerns about reduced visit schedules and use of televisits, several potential benefits were also noted. Our synthesis of qualitative evidence provides helpful insights into the perspectives, preferences, and experiences of important stakeholders with respect to implementing changes to prenatal care delivery that may complement findings of traditional quantitative evidence syntheses.
Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, CRD42021272287.
Copyright © 2022 Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a “work of the United States Government” for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial Disclosure Kristin J. Konnyu disclosed receiving payment from the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute for analysis of a diabetes quality improvement systematic review and an audit and feedback systematic review. Alex Friedman Peahl is a paid consultant for Maven Clinic. The other authors did not disclose any potential conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Schedule of Visits and Televisits for Routine Antenatal Care: A Systematic Review [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2022 Jun. Report No.: 22-EHC031. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2022 Jun. Report No.: 22-EHC031. PMID: 35862565 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Televisits Compared With In-Person Visits for Routine Antenatal Care: A Systematic Review.Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jul 1;142(1):19-29. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005194. Epub 2023 Jun 7. Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 37290109
-
Reduced Compared With Traditional Schedules for Routine Antenatal Visits: A Systematic Review.Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jul 1;142(1):8-18. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005193. Epub 2023 Jun 7. Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 37290105
-
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532314 Review.
-
Patient and provider perspectives of a new prenatal care model introduced in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;224(4):384.e1-384.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Oct 8. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33039393 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Experiences of Midwestern obstetric clinicians during the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Aug 31;4(4):100392. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100392. eCollection 2024 Nov. AJOG Glob Rep. 2024. PMID: 39493438 Free PMC article.
-
Optimising digital clinical consultations in maternity care: a realist review and implementation principles.BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 1;14(10):e079153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079153. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39486829 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Barriers and facilitators to utilizing digital health technologies by healthcare professionals.NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Sep 18;6(1):161. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00899-4. NPJ Digit Med. 2023. PMID: 37723240 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Telehealth in antenatal care: recent insights and advances.BMC Med. 2023 Aug 30;21(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03042-y. BMC Med. 2023. PMID: 37649028 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prenatal Health Care Outcomes Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Pregnant Individuals and Their Newborns in an Integrated US Health System.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2324011. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.24011. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37462973 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: final data for 2016. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2018;67:1–55. Accessed November 29, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr67/nvsr67_01.pdf
-
- American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for perinatal care. 8th ed. Accessed November 29, 2022. https://www.acog.org/clinical-information/physician-faqs/-/media/3a22e15... 2017
-
- Australian Government Department of Health. Clinical practice guidelines: pregnancy care. Accessed December 10, 2020. https://www.health.gov.au/resources/pregnancy-care-guidelines
-
- World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Accessed December 10, 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250796/9789241549912-en...
-
- National Institutes of Health. Caring for our future: the content of prenatal care. A report of the Public Health Service Expert Panel on the Content of Prenatal Care. Accessed August 15, 2022. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED334018.pdf
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
