Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;131(2):27001.
doi: 10.1289/EHP11248. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

Transportation Noise and Risk of Tinnitus: A Nationwide Cohort Study from Denmark

Affiliations

Transportation Noise and Risk of Tinnitus: A Nationwide Cohort Study from Denmark

Manuella Lech Cantuaria et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Background: There is a growing body of evidence linking residential exposure to transportation noise with several nonauditory health outcomes. However, auditory outcomes, such as tinnitus, are virtually unexplored.

Objectives: We aimed to investigate the association between residential transportation noise and risk of incident tinnitus.

Methods: We conducted a nationwide cohort study including all residents in Denmark age 30y, of whom 40,692 were diagnosed with tinnitus. We modeled road traffic and railway noise at the most (Ldenmax) and least (Ldenmin) exposed façades of all Danish addresses from 1990 until 2017. For all participants, we calculated 1-, 5-, and 10-y time-weighted mean noise exposure and retrieved detailed information on individual- and area-level socioeconomic covariates. We conducted analyses using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: We found positive associations between exposure to road traffic noise and risk of tinnitus, with hazard ratios of 1.06 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04, 1.08] and 1.02 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.03) per 10-dB increase in 10-y Ldenmin and Ldenmax, respectively. Highest risk estimates were found for women, people without a hearing loss, people with high education and income, and people who had never been in a blue-collar job. The association with road Ldenmin followed a positive, monotonic exposure-response relationship. We found no association between railway noise and tinnitus.

Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that residential exposure to road traffic noise may increase risk of tinnitus, suggesting noise may negatively affect the auditory system. If confirmed, this finding adds to the growing evidence of road traffic noise as a harmful pollutant with a substantial health burden. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11248.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figures 1A and 1B are error bar graphs, plotting hazard ratio, ranging from 0.95 to 1.30 in increments of 0.05 (y-axis) across road traffic noise at the most exposed façade (10 year, decibel), ranging from 40 to 75 in increments of 5 and 35 to 65 in increments of 5 (x-axis).
Figure 1.
Associations between 10-y mean exposure to road traffic noise at the most (A) and least (B) exposed façades and risk of tinnitus using the fully adjusted model. The vertical bars show hazard ratios with 95% confidence interval at the median of the exposure categories compared with the reference category. Reference category was <45 dB for Ldenmax and <40 dB for Ldenmin. Risk estimates and number of cases for each exposure category are shown in Table S3.
Figure 2 is a set of two forest plots titled Road traffic noise and tinnitus, plotting effect modifier with number of cases (bottom to top), ranging as Comorbidity: 8240 cases under yes and 32452 cases under no; Occupation: 22766 cases under Blue collar and 15179 cases under never blue collar; Green space (150 meters): 32313 cases under less than 15 percent and 8379 cases under greater than or equal to 15 percent; Income: 9785 cases of low (Quarter 1), 23938 cases of medium (Quarter 2 to Quarter 4), and 6969 cases High (Quarter 5); Education: 13176 cases of Low, 19327 cases of Medium, and 8189 cases of High; Sex: 23764 cases of Men and 16928 cases of Women; and Hearing loss: 32913 cases of yes and 7779 cases of no (y-axis) across hazard ratios (95 percent confidence intervals), ranging from 0.95 to 1.15 in increments of 0.05 and 0.95 to 1.30 in increments of 0.05 (x-axis) for most exposed façade (level begin subscript day, evening, night end subscript maximum) and least exposed façade (level begin subscript day, evening, night end subscript minimum).
Figure 2.
Effect modification analysis of associations between 10-y mean road traffic noise (continuous, per 10 dB, using the fully adjusted model) at the most and least exposed façade and risk of tinnitus by: hearing loss diagnosis, sex, education, income, green space (150m), occupation, and comorbidity. Risk estimates and number of cases in each modifier subgroup are shown in Table S5.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. European Environment Agency. 2020. Environmental Noise in Europe – 2020. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environmental-noise-in-europe/ [accessed 2 February 2022].
    1. Babisch W. 2002. The noise/stress concept, risk assessment and research needs. Noise Health 4(16):1–11, PMID: . - PubMed
    1. Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, Brink M, Clark C, Janssen S, et al. . 2014. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet 383(9925):1325–1332, PMID: , 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61613-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. 2018. Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe. https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/383921/noise-guidel... [accessed 2 February 2022].
    1. Roswall N, Pyko A, Ögren M, Oudin A, Rosengren A, Lager A, et al. . 2021. Long-term exposure to transportation noise and risk of incident stroke: a pooled study of nine Scandinavian cohorts. Environ Health Perspect 129(10):1–10, PMID: , 10.1289/EHP8949. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types