Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 Jul 3;23(4):671-679.
doi: 10.17305/bb.2022.8393.

Time to diagnostic certainty for saddle pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients

Affiliations
Observational Study

Time to diagnostic certainty for saddle pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients

Yuliya Pinevich et al. Biomol Biomed. .

Abstract

There is a lack of diagnostic performance measures associated with pulmonary embolism (PE). We aimed to explore the concept of the time to diagnostic certainty, which we defined as the time interval that elapses between first presentation of a patient to a confirmed PE diagnosis with computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CT PA). This approach could be used to highlight variability in health system diagnostic performance, and to select patient outliers for structured chart review in order to identify underlying contributors to diagnostic error or delay. We performed a retrospective observational study at academic medical centers and associated community-based hospitals in one health system, examining randomly selected adult patients admitted to study sites with a diagnosis of acute saddle PE. One hundred patients were randomly selected from 340 patients discharged with saddle PE. Twenty-four patients were excluded. Among the 76 included patients, time to diagnostic certainty ranged from 1.5 to 310 hours. We found that 73/76 patients were considered to have PE present on admission (CT PA ≤ 48 hours). The proportion of patients with PE present on admission with time to diagnostic certainty of > 6 hours was 26% (19/73). The median (IQR) time to treatment (thrombolytics/anticoagulants) was 3.5 (2.5-5.1) hours among the 73 patients. The proportion of patients with PE present on admission with treatment delays of > 6 hours was 16% (12/73). Three patients acquired PE during hospitalization (CT PA > 48 hours). In this study, we developed and successfully tested the concept of time to diagnostic certainty for saddle PE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart diagram. CT PA: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography; Dx: Diagnosis; PE: Pulmonary embolism; TDx: Time to diagnostic certainty; TDx ≤ 48 hours: PE present on admission; TDx > 48 hours: PE acquired during hospitalization.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Time to diagnostic certainty for pulmonary embolism present on admission, hours. Analysis of the subgroup of patients with PE present on admission determined the median time to diagnostic certainty for PE was 3.4 (IQR 2.6–6.3) hours. Nineteen of 73 (26%) patients reached diagnostic certainty outside 6-hour time period. PE: Pulmonary embolism.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Bivariate analysis of time to diagnostic certainty and time to treatment, hours. Figure describes the relationship between time to diagnostic certainty and time to treatment in the 73 patients with pulmonary embolism present on admission. Based on time to diagnostic certainty and time to treatment, there were four groups of patients: 1) those with perfect diagnostic performance (early diagnosis and treatment), 2) risk of harm from late treatment (early diagnosis and late treatment), 3) risk of harm from overtreatment (early treatment and late diagnosis), and 4) poor diagnostic performance (risk of harm from late diagnosis and treatment).

Similar articles

References

    1. Barais M, Morio N, Cuzon Breton A, Barraine P, Calvez A, Stolper E, et al. “I can’t find anything wrong: it must be a pulmonary embolism”: diagnosing suspected pulmonary embolism in primary care, a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e98112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098112. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schiff GD, Hasan O, Kim S, Abrams R, Cosby K, Lambert BL, et al. Diagnostic error in medicine: analysis of 583 physician-reported errors. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(20):1881–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.333. - PubMed
    1. Gunderson CG, Bilan VP, Holleck JL, Nickerson P, Cherry BM, Chui P, et al. Prevalence of harmful diagnostic errors in hospitalised adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Qual Safety. 2020;29(12):1008–18. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010822. - PubMed
    1. Goldhaber SZ, Hennekens CH, Evans DA, Newton EC, Godleski JJ. Factors associated with correct antemortem diagnosis of major pulmonary embolism. Am J Med. 1982;73(6):822–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(82)90764-1. - PubMed
    1. Morgenthaler TI, Ryu JH. Clinical characteristics of fatal pulmonary embolism in a referral hospital. Mayo Clin Proc. 1995;70(5):417–24. https://doi.org/10.4065/70.5.417. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances