Deep-learning microscopy image reconstruction with quality control reveals second-scale rearrangements in RNA polymerase II clusters
- PMID: 36741438
- PMCID: PMC9896941
- DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac065
Deep-learning microscopy image reconstruction with quality control reveals second-scale rearrangements in RNA polymerase II clusters
Abstract
Fluorescence microscopy, a central tool of biological research, is subject to inherent trade-offs in experiment design. For instance, image acquisition speed can only be increased in exchange for a lowered signal quality, or for an increased rate of photo-damage to the specimen. Computational denoising can recover some loss of signal, extending the trade-off margin for high-speed imaging. Recently proposed denoising on the basis of neural networks shows exceptional performance but raises concerns of errors typical of neural networks. Here, we present a work-flow that supports an empirically optimized reduction of exposure times, as well as per-image quality control to exclude images with reconstruction errors. We implement this work-flow on the basis of the denoising tool Noise2Void and assess the molecular state and 3D shape of RNA polymerase II (Pol II) clusters in live zebrafish embryos. Image acquisition speed could be tripled, achieving 2-s time resolution and 350-nm lateral image resolution. The obtained data reveal stereotyped events of approximately 10 s duration: initially, the molecular mark for recruited Pol II increases, then the mark for active Pol II increases, and finally Pol II clusters take on a stretched and unfolded shape. An independent analysis based on fixed sample images reproduces this sequence of events, and suggests that they are related to the transient association of genes with Pol II clusters. Our work-flow consists of procedures that can be implemented on commercial fluorescence microscopes without any hardware or software modification, and should, therefore, be transferable to many other applications.
Keywords: fluorescence microscopy; gene regulation; image processing; reliable deep learning; transcription.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of National Academy of Sciences.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Noise2Void: unsupervised denoising of PET images.Phys Med Biol. 2021 Nov 1;66(21):10.1088/1361-6560/ac30a0. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac30a0. Phys Med Biol. 2021. PMID: 34663767 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of a deep learning-based CT image denoising method: Generalizability over dose, reconstruction kernel, and slice thickness.Med Phys. 2022 Feb;49(2):836-853. doi: 10.1002/mp.15430. Epub 2022 Jan 19. Med Phys. 2022. PMID: 34954845
-
Deep Learning-Based Denoising in High-Speed Portable Reflectance Confocal Microscopy.Lasers Surg Med. 2021 Aug;53(6):880-891. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23410. Epub 2021 Apr 23. Lasers Surg Med. 2021. PMID: 33891330 Free PMC article.
-
Overview of image-to-image translation by use of deep neural networks: denoising, super-resolution, modality conversion, and reconstruction in medical imaging.Radiol Phys Technol. 2019 Sep;12(3):235-248. doi: 10.1007/s12194-019-00520-y. Epub 2019 Jun 20. Radiol Phys Technol. 2019. PMID: 31222562 Review.
-
Deep learning on image denoising: An overview.Neural Netw. 2020 Nov;131:251-275. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.025. Epub 2020 Aug 6. Neural Netw. 2020. PMID: 32829002 Review.
Cited by
-
RNA polymerase II dynamics shape enhancer-promoter interactions.Nat Genet. 2023 Aug;55(8):1370-1380. doi: 10.1038/s41588-023-01442-7. Epub 2023 Jul 10. Nat Genet. 2023. PMID: 37430091 Free PMC article.
-
Regulation of chromatin microphase separation by binding of protein complexes.Elife. 2023 Jul 12;12:e82983. doi: 10.7554/eLife.82983. Elife. 2023. PMID: 37436818 Free PMC article.
-
Amphiphiles Formed from Synthetic DNA-Nanomotifs Mimic the Stepwise Dispersal of Transcriptional Clusters in the Cell Nucleus.Nano Lett. 2023 Sep 13;23(17):7815-7824. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c01301. Epub 2023 Aug 16. Nano Lett. 2023. PMID: 37586706 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of Deep Learning-Based Phase Retrieval Algorithm Performance for Quantitative Phase Imaging Microscopy.Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 6;22(9):3530. doi: 10.3390/s22093530. Sensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35591220 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Stephens DJ, Allan VJ. 2003. Light microscopy techniques for live cell imaging. Science. 300(5616):82–86. - PubMed
-
- Icha J, Weber M, Waters JC, Norden C. 2017. Phototoxicity in live fluorescence microscopy, and how to avoid it. BioEssays. 39(8):1700003. - PubMed
-
- Laissue PP, Alghamdi RA, Tomancak P, Reynaud EG, Shroff H. 2017. Assessing phototoxicity in live fluorescence imaging. Nat Methods. 14(7):657–661. - PubMed
-
- Pawley J. 2006. Handbook of biological confocal microscopy. Vol. 236. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
